article thumbnail

Pennsylvania court declares state mail-in voting law unconstitutional

JURIST

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Friday declared unconstitutional Pennsylvania’s “no-excuse mail-in voting law,” which permits voters to cast their ballots by mail without providing an excuse for their absence. ” The court again held the voting law unconstitutional, referencing its McLinko decision. .”

Laws 249
article thumbnail

Pennsylvania Supreme Court orders state police to disclose social media monitoring policy

JURIST

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ruled Tuesday that the state police (PSP) must disclose its social media monitoring policy to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Pennsylvania under the state’s right-to-know law (RTKL). The case is an appeal from the Commonwealth Court of Pennslyvania. Justice David N.

Court 197
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court agrees to hear cases on statute of limitations, personal jurisdiction

JURIST

Norfolk Southern Railway Company , which focus on statute of limitations and personal jurisdiction issues. In Reed , petitioner Rodney Reed asked the court to decide when “the statute of limitations begins to run for an action under 42 U.S.C. The US Supreme Court Monday granted certiorari to two cases, Reed v.

Statute 196
article thumbnail

Court upholds state corporate registration law in major personal jurisdiction case

SCOTUSBlog

Share The justices narrowly rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of a Pennsylvania law that allows any company doing business in the state to be sued there – even if the corporation is not headquartered in Pennsylvania and the conduct at the center of the lawsuit occurred somewhere else. of Philadelphia v.

Laws 115
article thumbnail

Justices to consider choice-of-law clauses in maritime insurance contracts

SCOTUSBlog

Perhaps some of the justices will even enjoy a return to their law-school days, as they consider whether state or federal law should govern the enforceability of maritime choice-of-law clauses. The question here is whether the rules for enforcing the choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract fall within one of those gaps.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Upholds Corporate Personal Jurisdiction Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring corporations operating within their borders to consent to personal jurisdiction when they register to do business in those states. According to the Court, such laws do not offend the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. , Washington , 326 U.S.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Justices favor reliable enforcement of choice-of-law clauses in maritime insurance contracts

SCOTUSBlog

The question – whether state or federal law should govern the enforceability of maritime choice-of-law clauses – at first seems technical. Here, for example, a foreign insurance company insured a yacht owned by a Pennsylvania company. The argument suggests that the decision here will reconcile three of the court’s earlier cases.