companies international-trademark-association 
Patently O
OCTOBER 18, 2021
It owns valuable intangible property associated with the trade name “Edible Arrangements.” The law [of Georgia] protects its right to exclude others from trading on that name and its associated good will for profit. NOT a TM Case: A key aspect of the case is that Edible is not on suing trademark law. Constitution. ”
The Fashion Law
JANUARY 16, 2022
OpenSea “agreed with Hermès” and removed the NFTs, the company claims. The official HERMÈS website can be found at www.Hermès.com.” Again, Hermès pushes back, asserting that no such protections shield Rothschild for a number of reasons.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Fashion Law
NOVEMBER 25, 2021
The metaverse is appearing more frequently in companies’ branding efforts, with companies like Nike launching an experience of its own within the Roblox metaverse, Balenciaga offering up products to wear in the Fortnite metaverse, and Tokens.com’s Metaverse Group subsidiary paid $2.4 formerly Facebook Inc.)
The Fashion Law
JULY 15, 2021
Crocs is doubling-down on an existing effort to rid the market of an influx of fakes by way of a handful of newly-filed trademark lawsuits. d/b/a Akira as a defendant, Crocs asserts that it maintains an array of “valuable trademarks” for its Classic Clog shoe, which it first began selling in 2003.
The Fashion Law
JULY 8, 2021
International Trade Commission will initiate a probe into the import and subsequent sale in the U.S. of footwear and packaging that allegedly infringes the trademark-protected offerings of Crocs. all imported shoes that violate Crocs rights in [its] asserted trademarks.”
The Fashion Law
JULY 21, 2021
” In turn, Nike claims that it stands to “lose control over its brand, business reputation, and associated goodwill, which it has spent decades building.” In the complaint that it filed in a federal court in California on Monday, Nike claims that Customs By Ilene, Inc.,
InHouseBlog
NOVEMBER 26, 2022
For applicants considering filing for a trademark, an important criterion for granting registration is the legal standard of “likelihood of confusion.” Accordingly, the trademark examining attorney can refuse a trademark application under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. By Jay Pattamundi, Esq.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
99 
Let's personalize your content