article thumbnail

US appeals court rules against tool used to enforce Voting Rights Act

JURIST

In a 2-1 decision, the Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that the US Attorney General must be a plaintiff in a suit brought to enforce the VRA. ” Though the court could not determine whether Section 2 creates an individual right, it found that the statute does not contain a private enforcement mechanism.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules immigration detainees not guaranteed bond hearings

JURIST

After Arteaga-Martinez sued to be allowed a hearing, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed that Arteaga-Martinez was allowed a hearing under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which says that detainees held beyond the removal period of six months must be declared a risk by the Attorney General.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

US federal judge blocks request to reinstate abortion ban in Guam

JURIST

A federal court in Guam Friday denied a request to reinstate a total abortion ban on the island of Guam. The Attorney General of Guam Douglas Moylan filed the motion to reinstate the ban. ” Here, the court ruled that the US Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. 20-134 , should remain in effect.

Statute 197
article thumbnail

BREAKING: Exxon Must Face Climate Suit, Mass. Top Court Rules

Law 360

cannot use a free speech statute to duck a climate change suit brought by the Massachusetts Attorney General, the state's top court ruled Tuesday, finding that the law in question applies to private suits but not public enforcement actions. ExxonMobil Corp.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines North Carolina appeal in undercover investigations case

JURIST

The US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from North Carolina on Monday over the constitutionality of a state law allowing employers to sue employees working as undercover investigators. ” The denial from the Supreme Court offered no explanation or reasoning. The challenged statute, N.C.

article thumbnail

Arizona Supreme Court determines abortion law from 1864 is enforceable

JURIST

In 1971, the Tucson branch of reproductive rights organization Planned Parenthood challenged the constitutionality of the statute. Wade , at which point the state statute was deemed unconstitutional and enforcement of it was enjoined. The 2022 ruling Dobbs v. Reproductive rights advocates lamented the decision.

Laws 249
article thumbnail

Scolding the Legislature for lack of clarity, Supreme Court rules statute can retroactively reduce probation without negating plea deal

At the Lectern

Prudholme , the Supreme Court today holds that legislation reducing maximum probation terms applies retroactively and, when so applied, doesn’t jeopardize a plea agreement reached under the harsher superseded law. Stamps (2020) 9 Cal.5th

Statute 40