JURIST

MARCH 26, 2023

A federal court in Guam Friday denied a request to reinstate a total abortion ban on the island of Guam. The Attorney General of Guam Douglas Moylan filed the motion to reinstate the ban. ” Here, the court ruled that the US Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. 20-134 , should remain in effect.

Statute 197

Statute Misdemeanor Felony Court Rules 197

Day on Torts

FEBRUARY 8, 2021

55-8-136, which is a Class C misdemeanor, the statute of limitations for plaintiff’s action was extended to two years pursuant to Tenn. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations issue, but the trial court ruled in favor of plaintiff, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Statute 59

Statute Personal Injury Cause of Action Misdemeanor 59

At the Lectern

MARCH 24, 2022

The Second District, Division Six, Court of Appeal’s unpublished opinion in Nelson affirmed the dismissal of an action against the Santa Barbara Sheriff’s and District Attorney’s offices for, among other things, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and negligence. Lange (Oct. 30, 2019, No. 2011, 210 L.Ed.2d

Misdemeanor 56

Misdemeanor Court Statute Government 56

JonathanTurley

MAY 12, 2021

” The language of the statute in my view is unconstitutional due to its sweeping criminalization of any “curse or abuse” that could “provoke a breach of the peace.” As the United States Supreme Court ruled in National Ass’n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Winston , 199 S.E.2d

Statute 39

Statute Misdemeanor Court Rules Court 39

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

The federal district court for the Eastern District of California held that more analysis of the impacts climate change would have on a water transfer program for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta was required under NEPA. In a letter to the court on March 2, the parties asked the court to defer further briefing on the U.S.-based

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JUNE 8, 2021

Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.

Court 42

Court Statute Government Litigation 42

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The court further found that EPCA’s legislative history did not support the plaintiff’s “expansive interpretation.”

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40