Paralegal Bootcamp

JULY 25, 2022

This includes the processes used to identify the laws and documents that apply to the facts of a specific case, including statutes, regulations, and court opinions. A large part of this consists of conducting legal research.

Paralegal 246

Paralegal Paralegals Drafting Legal Assistant 246

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 16, 2023

Share In an opinion released on Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that noncitizens subject to deportation do not have to ask the Board of Immigration Appeals to reconsider its allegedly erroneous decisions before seeking judicial review in the federal courts of appeals. The Board of Immigration Appeals upheld that decision.

Court Rules 107

Court Rules Court Immigration Litigation 107

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 14, 2023

Share The nation’s immigration courts are breaking under the cumulative weight of a byzantine statutory scheme, chronic understaffing, and insurmountable case backlogs. She was detained and subsequently applied for a type of humanitarian relief known as “withholding of removal” under the Immigration & Nationality Act.

Immigration 76

Immigration Court Government Statute 76

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 29, 2024

They described the question presented by the case as “critically important,” explaining that “RICO is a frequently litigated federal statute that imposes treble damages and attorneys’ fees.” “If The companies came to the Supreme Court last fall, asking the justices to take up the case and weigh in.

Personal Injury 104

Personal Injury Court Immigration Statute 104

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 20, 2023

Both an immigration judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals rejected her request. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, Santos-Zacaria argued that the board violated Department of Homeland Security regulations by basing its decision on facts the immigration judge did not find. Appealing to the U.S.

Immigration 73

Immigration Government Court Statute 73

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2021

Fazaga , is the second case this term in which the justices will consider the state-secrets privilege, a doctrine that allows the government to withhold information in litigation when disclosing it would compromise national security. The case, Federal Bureau of Investigation v. The first case, United States v.

Government 113

Government Statute Court Litigation 113

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 2, 2022

and global climate litigation movement. Moreover, the case in Puerto Rico comes after recent litigation successes in Europe and elsewhere around the world, with courts holding governments and companies accountable for climate harms. climate litigation brought by cities and other subnational jurisdictions is still rare.

Litigation 98

Litigation Litigating Cause of Action Punitive Damages 98

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 24, 2023

Share Federal immigration law requires the deportation of noncitizens who are convicted of an aggravated felony, which includes offenses “relating to obstruction of justice.” By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in Pugin v. Such “redundancies are common in statutory drafting,” Kavanaugh wrote. citizen].”

Felony 101

Felony Statute Immigration Court 101

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 17, 2024

Natural Resources Defense Council that courts should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. The question in this challenge to the rule, he said should focus on what the best reading of the statute is. Share It has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v.

Court 145

Court Statute Stare Decisis Small Business 145

Constitutional Law Reporter

JULY 12, 2023

Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. The States of Texas and Louisiana claim that the Guidelines contravene two federal statutes that they contend require the arrest of certain noncitizens upon their release from prison ( 8 U.S.C. 1231(a)(2) ).

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Rules Court Entertainment 52

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 17, 2023

Natural Resources Defense Council , in which the court held that when a federal statute is ambiguous, courts should defer to an agency’s interpretation of that law as long as it is reasonable. But at the arguments on Jan. On the first day of the session, Jan. The question before the court in FBI v. Garland (consolidated with Garland v.

Immigration 118

Immigration Calendaring Government Manufacturing 118

Attorney at Work

MAY 31, 2022

The statute of limitations ran out due to his forgetting the deadline. A Chicago immigration lawyer moved for an emergency stay of removal for a client after an asylum application was denied. The Tennessee lawyer failed to add a calendar reminder to track the statute of limitations deadline.

Calendaring 119

Calendaring Court Lawyer Lawyers 119

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 25, 2024

Individuals are sometimes removed from the No Fly List during ongoing litigation about their placement on that list. Garland: The immigration case centers on the Immigration and Nationality Act, which provides that a noncitizen who does not appear at a removal hearing shall be ordered removed in absentia. Campos-Chaves v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Government Court Manufacturing 52

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 19, 2024

Ordinarily, under the so-called “American Rule,” each litigant pays its own attorney’s fees, whether it wins or loses. Certain statutes permit the payment of “a reasonable attorney’s fee” to “the prevailing party” in litigation: 42 U.S.C. Before the case could go to trial, the Virginia general assembly repealed the statute.

Felony 121

Felony Immigration Court Statute 121

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2021

1326 , they must prove the existence of a prior removal order adjudicated by a federal immigration agency. Refugio Palomar-Santiago’s case illustrates two broader themes: first, the various interactions between the civil immigration and criminal legal systems, and second, the ongoing complexity of the immigration laws.

Immigration 98

Immigration Felony Statute Court 98

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 16, 2021

The statutory question presented is whether noncitizens certified by the government for the humanitarian relief program known as Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, have been “admitted” to the United States, as required by the adjustment-of-status statute. Sanchez and Gonzalez argue that the TPS statute, codified at 8 U.S.C.

Immigration 125

Immigration Statute Government Laws 125

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 2, 2021

Garland , opting for a strict reading of an immigration statute that turns on whether the government has provided proper notice to a noncitizen to appear for removal proceedings. The litigation in Niz-Chavez built upon a similar case, Pereira v. The Board of Immigration Appeals and the U.S.

Government 101

Government Immigration Statute Litigation 101

LettersBlogatory

OCTOBER 6, 2022

I’ve also been litigating the issue of the location of electronically stored information, in Section 1782 cases and in others, which raises similar issues about locale, but I’m leaving it aside because it doesn’t involve the actors in a legally significant act being in the same place at the same time). 117 (1922) ).

ESI 52

ESI Contract Statute Laws 52

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 23, 2022

Share Can the Biden administration issue guidelines setting priorities in the enforcement of immigration law? In 2011, John Morton, then the director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, issued a series of memos setting enforcement priorities. Do states have standing to challenge these guidelines?

Immigration 97

Immigration Court Laws Statute 97

JonathanTurley

JUNE 9, 2023

Newsom cited the kidnapping statute but apparently failed to read it or the underlying cases. There is nothing unlawful about conveying individuals who are lawfully in the country pending their immigration hearings. The reason is that these claims are made for cable news, not courts of law.

Laws 38

Laws Misdemeanor Attorney Felony 38

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 11, 2023

Under the False Claims Act, a defendant is liable for submitting a false claim to the government for payment if it acts “knowingly,” which the statute defines as acting with actual knowledge, deliberate ignorance, or reckless disregard. Natural Resources Defense Council to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ interpretation of that phrase.

Government 85

Government Court Legal Legal 85

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. In re: Border Infrastructure Environmental Litigation , No. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 7, 2021

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. and non-U.S.

Court 40

Court Government Construction Litigation 40

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule. The post Litigation continues over public charge immigration rule appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Immigration 85

Immigration Litigation Litigating Administrative Law 85

JonathanTurley

JUNE 11, 2021

Below is my column in The Hill on the recent decisions of Attorney General Merrick Garland to support the prior positions taken by his predecessor, William Barr, on issues ranging from the Lafayette Park protests to immigration to withholding information related to the Mueller investigation.

Legal 57

Legal Legal Attorney Laws 57

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 30, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Thursday handed the Biden administration a major victory, giving it the green light to end one of the Trump administration’s signature immigration programs: the controversial “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while they wait for a hearing in U.S. immigration court.

Court 97

Court Immigration Government Statute 97

Patently O

MARCH 17, 2024

As we’ve explained in a series of articles , in many federal courts throughout the country, all or practically all cases are assigned to a single judge, giving litigants the ability to “judge shop”—that is, to choose their own judge. Judge shopping has been a particularly long-standing problem in patent cases and corporate bankruptcy cases.

Statute 83

Statute Government Court Litigation 83

JURIST

DECEMBER 14, 2021

The MPP, also known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy, requires asylum-seekers on the southern border to wait in Mexico, sometimes for years, while their asylum claims are processed in the US immigration system. It is unclear if the Biden administration will pursue further litigation to end MPP.

Court 197

Court Immigration Statute Government 197

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 25, 2024

He pointed to the prospect, for example, that President Joe Biden could be charged with unlawfully inducing immigrants to enter the United States illegally through his border control policies. He told Dreeben that it’s a “serious constitutional question whether a criminal statute can apply to the president’s criminal acts.”

Court 145

Court Statute Immigration Government 145

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 26, 2022

Her mother hails from Jamaica, while her late father was the son of Jewish immigrants from eastern Europe. Kruger left WilmerHale for the University of Chicago Law School, where she taught a class in transnational litigation as a visiting assistant professor. Early life and career.

Court 113

Court Laws Lawyer Lawyers 113

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 6, 2023

Allowing the emergency declarations to expire will unravel an array of federal policies on issues like free at-home tests, temporary Medicaid coverage, and even immigration. Share The White House said last week that it will stop classifying COVID-19 as a national emergency on May 11. The pandemic is over ,” Biden said at the time.

Immigration 109

Immigration Legal Legal Court 109

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2020

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S. If you know of any cases we have missed, please email us at columbiaclimate@gmail.com.

Court Reporting 40

Court Reporting Court Government Construction 40

JURIST

JANUARY 29, 2022

.” Villanueva also promised to end the “pipeline to deportation” by cutting off the Sheriff’s Department’s cooperation and financial ties with federal immigration authorities. Sure enough, Villanueva delivered on some of his promises starting with his first week in office.

Immigration 177

Immigration Depositions Calendaring Government 177

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 18, 2022

The argument comes less than a month after the justices heard oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of Republican-led states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy after the Biden administration opted not to do so. North Carolina General Assembly via Wikimedia Commons). North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein.

Litigation 95

Litigation Litigating Attorney Court 95

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 19, 2023

The absence of clear guidance from the Supreme Court distinguishing “major” questions from “non-major” ones has complicated efforts to establish the boundaries of the doctrine, and litigators have moved quickly to exploit this ambiguity in the doctrine’s rhetoric. However, it objected to the EPA’s interpretation of its authorizing statute.

Statute 76

Statute Court Government Administrative Law 76

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 21, 2021

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act , immigrants can be denied green cards if, “in the opinion of” the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, the person is “likely at any time to become a public charge.” Department of Homeland Security v. New York , 20-449 , and Wolf v. New York City and Lucas v. 15 conference).

Court 88

Court Immigration Statute Law Firm 88