FDA Law Blog

FEBRUARY 5, 2023

Six district courts presided over these decisions. AstraZeneca won in the District of Delaware, while Sanofi Aventis and Novo Nordisk lost at the District of New Jersey. Both courts found the statute to be ambiguous, but only the Delaware court vacated HRSA’s penalties; the New Jersey court remanded the issue to HRSA.

Contract 52

Contract Statute Manufacturing Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 13, 2024

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether someone can sue under RICO to recover lost earnings. The district court ruled for the company on Horn’s RICO claim.

Personal Injury 102

Personal Injury Laws Court Statute 102

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 30, 2021

Share The Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. New Jersey that sovereign immunity does not shield New Jersey from condemnation proceedings instituted by a private company in federal court to obtain properties for a pipeline. The court rejected the sovereign immunity defense.

Statute 62

Statute Court Government Construction 62

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 7, 2021

Share This week we highlight petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether an award of punitive damages that doubles the compensatory damages can comport with due process and how a defendant can prove ineffective assistance of counsel in rejecting a plea offer. New Jersey. On appeal, the U.S.

Punitive Damages 56

Punitive Damages Compensatory Damages Statute Government 56

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 2, 2021

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard argument in PennEast Pipeline Co. New Jersey. The case presents two questions : (1) whether sovereign immunity prevents PennEast from instituting eminent domain proceedings in federal court to condemn properties in which New Jersey has interests, and (2) whether the U.S.

Government 67

Government Construction Statute Court 67

Patently O

FEBRUARY 3, 2021

As an example, the Federal Wire Fraud statute makes it a crime to use the “wires” to move forward with “any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises.” But the federal fraud statutes at issue do not criminalize all such conduct.

Laws 83

Laws Statute Government Court 83

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 3, 2022

Share The fate of hundreds of millions of dollars in unclaimed money may depend on the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the term “money order” in an arcane 1974 federal statute. The dispute at the Supreme Court involves a category of financial products that MoneyGram calls “official checks.” On one side is Delaware.

Statute 95

Statute Drafting Court Laws 95

Constitutional Law Reporter

APRIL 11, 2023

Supreme Court held that uncashed MoneyGram checks are governed by the Disposition of Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler’s Check Act (FDA) and should be returned to the state where they were issued. New Jersey , 379 U.S. According to the Court, the Disputed Instruments share two relevant similarities with money orders.

Constitutional Law 59

Constitutional Law Court Statute Government 59

FDA Law Blog

OCTOBER 6, 2021

When HRSA threatened enforcement action and penalties, several companies sued the HHS in federal district courts in Maryland, Indiana, Delaware, New Jersey, and the District of Columbia to enjoin those enforcement actions (see list below). The currently pending lawsuits in federal court are AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals v.

Manufacturing 52

Manufacturing Contract Statute Court 52

Patently O

AUGUST 2, 2021

Both SITO and Hulu are Delaware companies with Hulu headquartered Santa Monica and SITO in New Jersey (although SITO is currently going through Chapter 11 reorganization bankruptcy). Section 1404(a) seems straight forward as providing a district court discretionary authority to transfer a case. Patent Nos. 1404(a). (a)

Court 90

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 90

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 28, 2022

Texas Department of Public Safety , to be argued on Tuesday, the Supreme Court will decide whether a private individual can sue his state-agency employer for violating the federal Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994. USERRA allows individuals to sue non-compliant employers in either state or federal court.

Court 83

Court Government Statute Felony 83

The Crime Report

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Yet being locked up in a Florida prison, it turns out, doesn’t make someone a Florida resident, under a state Department of Education statute. A second document such as a utility bill, lease, court record or proof of family relationship to a Florida resident is also required. He most certainly hasn’t left the state for decades.

Education 98

Education Statute Court 98

The Crime Report

MAY 16, 2022

The primary architect of New York’s bail reform statute, Gianaris says that, in a system that promotes the idea of a person being innocent until proven guilty, the injustice in cash bail should be obvious to everyone. That is unjust in so many ways.”. percent in 2017 versus 11.5 percent, from 92.7 percent in 2014.

Felony 111

Felony Misdemeanor Statute Attorney 111

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 6, 2017

Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lacked authority to administratively stay portions of new source performance standards for the oil and gas sector for which it had granted requests for reconsideration. The court therefore found that the stay was unauthorized and vacated it.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Attorney 40

Broadcast Law Blog

APRIL 13, 2016

A few states, including New Jersey and Florida, have passed criminal statutes making pirate radio illegal, but such enforcement, in the few cases that I have dealt with in those states, has tended to be a low enforcement priority for state authorities. What is the reality of this actually happening?

Statute 40

Statute Legal Legal Education 40

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 8, 2021

This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider cases and statutes about suing various government entities, ranging from two counties to a state governor to the United States itself. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor v. Murphy involves New Jersey and New York’s Waterfront Commission Compact.

Government 86

Government Tort Court Rules Court 86

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 8, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Pennsylvania law that allows any company doing business in the state to be sued there – even if the corporation is not headquartered there and the conduct at the center of the lawsuit occurred somewhere else.

Court 88

Court Laws Lawyer Lawyers 88

Diane Drain

APRIL 15, 2021

At the other end of the spectrum, New Jersey and Pennsylvania provide no homestead exemptions, while Virginia and Kentucky allow just $5,000. Another is that it would turn any existing court judgment into a lien on a person’s home, automatically and retroactively. Morris Institute of Justice, in a commentary.

Laws 211

Laws Small Business Attorney Finance 211

The Crime Report

JULY 15, 2022

Already, New York lawmakers convened a special session seeking to cure the defects the Court found in Bruen. Similarly, on July 5, New Jersey Gov. These states’ new regimes go far beyond what more conservative, and generally more rural, states are inclined to seriously consider. Indeed, in the 1957 case U.S.

Laws 98

Laws Technology Court Legal 98

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 19, 2023

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Laws governing elections and the right to participate in the political process receive varying degrees of scrutiny when challenged in court. A federal district court dismissed their lawsuit.

Statute 87

Statute Court Government Laws 87

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 14, 2022

New York, Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey filed suit, arguing that the new law violated the Constitution — specifically, Article I, Section 8 , and the 10th and 16th Amendments — because it interfered with states’ sovereign taxing authority by unduly coercing them to change their sovereign tax policies and by denying them equal sovereignty.

Court 99

Court Manufacturing Statute Laws 99

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 20, 2020

Federal Court in Rhode Island Allowed Failure-to-Adapt Claims to Proceed. The federal district court for the District of Rhode Island for the most part denied a motion to dismiss a citizen suit asserting that Shell Oil Products US and other defendants (Shell) failed to prepare a terminal in Providence for the impacts of climate change.

Court 72

Court Government Compensatory Damages Litigation 72

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 2, 2023

Share The Supreme Court on Monday morning declined to take an appeal by anti-abortion activists in a First Amendment dispute with Planned Parenthood, as well as a test of New Jersey’s “slogan statutes.” courts Dermody v. The specific question at issue in Mazo v. 6 attacks on the U.S. International Paper Co.

Statute 94

Statute Court Attorney Laws 94

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving the deference that courts should give to federal agencies’ interpretations of the laws that they administer. Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 6, 2022

A panel on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seemed to be channeling the lyrics of the musical Hamilton in noting that “Everything is legal in New Jersey.” Garber insisted that the court should have based its decision on the question of whether OPAA applied to Green’s claim.

Entertainment 40

Entertainment Statute Court Court Rules 40

JURIST

FEBRUARY 5, 2021

The US Supreme Court released an order on Wednesday granting the Biden administration’s request to remove oral arguments for challenges on now-defunct Trump administration immigration policies. The Supreme Court’s order separately granted a writ of certiorari in a natural-gas pipeline case. The removed cases, Mayorkas v.

Immigration 211

Immigration Calendaring Court Construction 211

JonathanTurley

JULY 11, 2021

397 (1989), the Supreme Court voted 5-4 that flag burning was protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. For we are presented with a clear and simple statute to be judged against a pure command of the Constitution. The remedy in such cases is found in the court of public opinion. In Texas v.

Misdemeanor 47

Misdemeanor Government Laws Statute 47

The Crime Report

JUNE 24, 2022

A Supreme Court decision Thursday upending a century-old New York State gun licensing restriction has been called a major blow to state gun control interventions across the country. The Court released its opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v. It’s not what New Yorkers want,” Hochul said. ““We

Court 52

Court Felony Laws Legal 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

Circuit Court of Appeals found that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) failed to adequately analyze the climate change and environmental justice impacts of two liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals on the Brownsville Shipping Channel in Texas and two pipelines that would carry LNG to one of the terminals. 20-1045 (D.C.

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Court Laws 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

Federal Court Denied Oakland and San Francisco Motions to Return Climate Change Nuisance Cases to State Court; Found Federal Common Law of Nuisance Could Apply, Despite AEP v. The court dispensed with the cities’ three primary arguments for remanding the cases. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 107.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2021

Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the U.S. The court therefore vacated and remanded the ACE Rule—which repealed the 2015 Clean Power Plan rule and in its place adopted a replacement rule that relied only on heat-rate improvements at individual plants. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Third, the D.C. American Lung Association v.

Court Reporting 54

Court Reporting Court Construction Government 54

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 7, 2022

The new balance of power on the court was on display before the term officially began, when the justices rejected a request to block enforcement of S.B. The court’s third liberal, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, also dissented, though she did not join Roberts’ opinion.). An abortion prelude. Wade and Planned Parenthood v.

Laws 101

Laws Stare Decisis Court Statute 101

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Supreme Court reversed an intermediate appellate court’s decision affirming a superior court determination that the defendant could not present a necessity defense.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

APRIL 9, 2021

Second Circuit Rejected New York City’s State Law Climate Claims Against Oil Companies. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of New York City’s lawsuit seeking climate change damages from oil companies. The Second Circuit’s decision largely followed the reasoning of the district court’s 2018 decision.

Court 111

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 111

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

Numerous groups attack the viability standard that the court adopted in Roe v. Many amici focus on the principle of stare decisis – and urge the court not to follow it in this case. They say Roe and Casey are not worthy of the deference that the court typically affords to its prior decisions. The viability framework.

Stare Decisis 136

Stare Decisis Court Laws Legal 136

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 29, 2023

The Democratic senator from New Jersey said he was haunted by a question that “ keeps me up at night ” — whether President Donald Trump was compromised by the Russian government because of past secret dealings. Instead, they sought an embarrassing “ sweetheart deal ” that collapsed in court.

Sports 62

Sports Statute Lawyer Lawyers 62