article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: Tykes and Trial Lawyers Gather for All Hallow’s Eve

JonathanTurley

It is no accident that the Irish not only brought Halloween to the United States (as part of the festival of Samhain) but flooded our state bars with Irish lawyers eager to bring lawsuits over Halloween mishaps. So without further ado, here are this year’s spookiest of torts. follow the rules.”She

Tort 41
article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: The 2023 List of Litigation Horrors

JonathanTurley

Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Halloween of course remains a holiday seemingly designed for personal injury lawyers around the world and this year’s additions show why. Halloween has everything for a torts-filled holiday: battery, trespass, defamation, nuisance, product liability and more.

Tort 44
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Three Supreme Court cases lead to California Lawyer of the Year honors

At the Lectern

The Daily Journal today named the recipients of its annual California Lawyer of the Year award. Three of the cases resulted in Supreme Court opinions. One of the three CLAY award Supreme Court decisions is Guardianship of Saul H. 5th 93 — “ Missed break premiums count as wages, State Supreme Court rules.”

Lawyer 81
article thumbnail

Appeal under Tennessee Public Protection Act ruled untimely.

Day on Torts

When appealing a trial court’s order dismissing or refusing to dismiss a case under the Tennessee Public Protection Act (TPPA), the appeal “must be filed within thirty days of the entry of that order.”. Note: Chapter 28, Section 14 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Conversion claim was time-barred due to plaintiffs’ constructive notice of claim.

Day on Torts

Under the modern discovery rule…, Plaintiffs were on constructive notice of their claim by October 5, 2009. Because plaintiffs had constructive notice of their claim in 2009, the Court ruled that the conversion claim should have been barred by the three-year statute of limitations.

article thumbnail

Scaffolding rental company owed no duty to roofer where homeowner opted to install scaffolding himself.

Day on Torts

After discovery, DSS filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. The trial court ruled that plaintiff had asserted a premises liability claim, and that “DSS did not owe Plaintiff a duty of care under premises liability.” Plaintiff then amended his complaint to assert claims against DSS as well.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Exclusion of HCLA expert based on locality rule affirmed.

Day on Torts

The trial court ruled that “Dr. Steege did not meet the locality rule outlined in Shipley v. Merely being licensed in Tennessee or a bordering state is not enough if the expert cannot also meet the locality rule. Steege from Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Code Ann. § 26-26-115(b). Williams , 350 S.W.3d 3d 527 (Tenn.

Tort 59