article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Gives Stare Decisis Effect to a Judgment of Claim Validity

Patently O

Stare decisis, Latin for “to stand by things decided,” is a legal principle that directs courts to adhere to previous judgments, i.e., precedent, when resolving a case with comparable facts. the Federal Circuit applied stare decisis to a prior validity ruling involving a different patent and a different accused infringer.

article thumbnail

Clarence Thomas: “When Someone Uses Stare Decisis that Means They’re Out of Arguments”

JonathanTurley

Wade as “an infidelity,” Thomas dismissed the reliance on the principle of stare decisis , or the respect for precedent. Thomas told an audience that “I always say that when someone uses stare decisis that means they’re out of arguments. That was one of the central arguments in favor of preserving Roe.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Word of the Month for August 2019: Stare Decisis

Legal Research is Easy

Thing is, these days law and the decisions courts hand down are very much like that. The kicker is that unlike parents (who, hopefully, are on the same page and the kid realizes that it's unlikely dad will overrule mom), it is critical that courts make the same rulings over and over so that people know how law will be applied.

article thumbnail

Morning Docket: 06.28.22

Above The Law

* Here's a map showing the legality of abortion, state by state. [ Stare decisis? appeared first on Above the Law. appeared first on Above the Law. The Guardian ]. I hardly knew her! [ A matter of judgment: Louisiana judge temporarily prevents abortion ban from kicking in. The post Morning Docket: 06.28.22

article thumbnail

India Supreme Court allows petition of 2002 communal riots victim

JURIST

Public Interest Litigation is a legal action filed in the Supreme Court to address issues affecting the public or societal interests rather than individual concerns. The court also clarified that the previous judgement was per incuriam (bad in law) as it contradicted previous larger bench judgements and hence was not a precedent.

article thumbnail

I Ran Justice Alito’s Draft Abortion Opinion through the BriefCatch Legal Editing Software. Here’s What Happened.

LawSites

But, legal tech nerd that I am, I wondered how the draft would fare if I subjected it to the scrutiny of the legal editing software BriefCatch , which recently rolled out a new-and-improved version 3 of its product. Gorsuch, whom Slate once pronounced a terrible writer. One thing about software is that it is politically neutral.

article thumbnail

US dispatch: ‘independent state legislature’ theory raised by Moore v. Harper threatens US election administration

JURIST

Marisa Wright is a US National Correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard Law School. . On Wednesday, December 7, the US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case involving a fringe legal idea called the independent state legislature theory that poses a threat to the current system of election administration in the United States.