JURIST

APRIL 24, 2021

The US Supreme Court ruled Thursday in Jones v. Jones argued that under two of the court’s recent decisions, 2012’s Miller v. .” … Now, it seems, the Court is willing to overrule precedent without even acknowledging it is doing so, much less providing any special justification.

Court Rules 104

Court Rules Stare Decisis Court Legal 104

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 10, 2021

In June 2020, the Supreme Court issued a summary reversal – meaning it decided the case without merits briefing or oral argument – in Andrus v. In June 2020, the Supreme Court issued a summary reversal – meaning it decided the case without merits briefing or oral argument – in Andrus v. Ineffective assistance of counsel. Washington.

Stare Decisis 95

Stare Decisis Court Court Rules Laws 95

The Crime Report

MAY 18, 2021

That not only amounts to a reversal of a precedent set earlier by the Court, but is an “alarming” step back in protecting juveniles, say Arthur Ago and Rochelle Swartz of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. The court is fooling no one,”” Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in her dissent. In Miller v.

Court Decisions 98

Court Decisions Stare Decisis Court Court Rules 98

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 30, 2022

Ross , involving a dormant commerce clause challenge to a California law prohibiting the sale of pork unless the pigs from which it was made (virtually all of which come from outside the state) were raised consistent with the state’s restrictive standards. On remand, the Texas court ruled that the inadequate counsel had not prejudiced Andrus.

Stare Decisis 98

Stare Decisis Court Felony Statute 98

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 20, 2022

Instead, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld “general jurisdiction” over Cooper on the ground that Cooper, by registering as a foreign corporation in Georgia, had consented to suit in Georgia as a condition of doing business in the state. Animal Legal Defense Fund. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit affirmed. Next up is Kelly v.

Statute 105

Statute Stare Decisis Court Manufacturing 105

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 6, 2022

Share This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. Gilles is a professor of law at Quinnipiac University School of Law. The Constitution leaves it to the people and their elected representatives to enact abortion laws that accord with their resolution of that issue.

Stare Decisis 109

Stare Decisis Court Legal Legal 109

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

The oral argument is scheduled for December 1st, the same week that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will hear an expedited appeal over the even more stringent Texas abortion law. That does not mean the court will do so, but it could substantially reduce Roe’s hold over states.

Stare Decisis 39

Stare Decisis Court Laws Law School 39