JonathanTurley

MAY 14, 2022

Wade as “an infidelity,” Thomas dismissed the reliance on the principle of stare decisis , or the respect for precedent. Thomas told an audience that “I always say that when someone uses stare decisis that means they’re out of arguments. That was one of the central arguments in favor of preserving Roe.

Stare Decisis 46

Stare Decisis Court Drafting Education 46

Legal Research is Easy

AUGUST 5, 2019

Thing is, these days law and the decisions courts hand down are very much like that. The kicker is that unlike parents (who, hopefully, are on the same page and the kid realizes that it's unlikely dad will overrule mom), it is critical that courts make the same rulings over and over so that people know how law will be applied.

Stare Decisis 52

Stare Decisis Notary Public Laws Court 52

Above The Law

JUNE 28, 2022

Stare decisis? appeared first on Above the Law. * Here's a map showing the legality of abortion, state by state. [ The Guardian ]. I hardly knew her! [ A matter of judgment: Louisiana judge temporarily prevents abortion ban from kicking in. States scramble to prevent the 2nd Amendment from being an absolute right. [

Stare Decisis 94

Stare Decisis Legal Legal Laws 94

Law 360

MAY 1, 2023

A recent Law360 guest article rightly questions the pretextual pseudo-originalism that permits ideology to masquerade as judicial philosophy, but the cure would kill the patient because directness, simplicity and humanness are achievable without renouncing form or sacrificing stare decisis, says Vanessa Kubota at the Arizona Court of Appeals.

Stare Decisis 75

Stare Decisis Laws Court 75

Above The Law

JULY 1, 2022

Stare decisis only matters when it’s convenient for this version of the high court. The post You Can Kiss Precedent Goodbye Thanks To The Supreme Court’s Conservative Majority appeared first on Above the Law.

Stare Decisis 98

Stare Decisis Court Laws 98

HowAppealing

OCTOBER 18, 2021

“A Century-Long ‘Reign of Error’ for a Supreme Court Typo; A sweeping statement in a 1928 opinion about property rights was revised soon after it was issued; But the error lived on”: Adam Liptak will have this new installment of his “Sidebar” column in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times about a forthcoming (..)

Stare Decisis 100

Stare Decisis Court Laws 100

JURIST

JUNE 17, 2022

Planned Parenthood sued to challenge a 2020 law which requires a 24 hour waiting period before an abortion. After a lower court ruled the law was unconstitutional, Iowa appealed to the state supreme court. The decision overturns a 2018 ruling which held there is a fundamental right to abortion in Iowa.

Stare Decisis 211

Stare Decisis Court Rules Court Court Decisions 211

Mondaq

JUNE 16, 2022

When a trial judge rules that a law is unconstitutional, who is bound by that decision? In R v Sullivan, 2022 SCC 19, the SCC has made it crystal clear: these declarations are.

Stare Decisis 40

Stare Decisis Laws 40

HowAppealing

JUNE 17, 2022

” Brendan Pierson of Reuters reports that “ Iowa top court rejects right to abortion, revives waiting period law.” ” You can access today’s divided ruling of the Supreme Court of Iowa at this link. ” The court’s longest serving associate justice, Brent R.

Stare Decisis 100

Stare Decisis Court Laws 100

JURIST

JANUARY 8, 2024

The court also clarified that the previous judgement was per incuriam (bad in law) as it contradicted previous larger bench judgements and hence was not a precedent. The court emphasized the paramount importance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution but also stressed the need for adherence to the rule of law.

Stare Decisis 104

Stare Decisis Court Litigation Litigating 104

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

Talevski , to be argued Tuesday, returns the court to the question of when federal law is subject to private enforcement. 1983 — which allows private suits for state and local deprivations of rights secured by federal law—to enforce federal statutes enacted under Congress’ spending clause power.

Stare Decisis 89

Stare Decisis Statute Court Contract 89

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 4, 2022

Brent Newton is a visiting professor of law at Penn State-Dickinson School of Law. He previously taught seminars on Breyer’s jurisprudence at American University Washington College of Law. These pragmatists consider the real-world consequences of the court’s decisions and value stare decisis and narrow rulings.

Stare Decisis 87

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Government Court 87

JURIST

APRIL 24, 2021

.” Even if the court had “doubts” about that rule, they should have provided “special justification” before overruling Miller and Montgomery , which they failed to do: How low this Court’s respect for stare decisis has sunk. … For most, the answer is yes.

Court Rules 104

Court Rules Stare Decisis Court Legal 104

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 10, 2021

Andrus further argues that the Texas court’s decision conflicts with “vertical stare decisis,” the principle that lower courts must follow the Supreme Court’s decisions. The law defines an animal facility as any place that houses or breeds animals used for food production, agriculture, or research. The case is Young v.

Stare Decisis 95

Stare Decisis Court Court Rules Laws 95

JURIST

DECEMBER 6, 2022

Marisa Wright is a US National Correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard Law School. . Instead, it refers more broadly to any individual or body that possesses some part of the power to make laws within a state — what the Court referred to as the ‘legislative power.’” Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015).

Stare Decisis 197

Stare Decisis Court Laws Legal 197

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 24, 2022

Jackson Women’s Health Organization , a challenge to a 2018 Mississippi law that bans virtually all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy. The law carves out exceptions for medical emergencies and cases involving a “severe fetal abnormality” but does not make exceptions for cases involving rape or incest.

Stare Decisis 136

Stare Decisis Court Drafting Laws 136

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 20, 2021

The doctrine stems from the common-law principle that one who sells property to another generally should not be able to undermine the value of the property by later challenging the rights the seller conveyed in the first place. A possible middle ground. But a middle ground exists. The court could maintain the doctrine but limit its scope.

Stare Decisis 107

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 107

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 30, 2022

Ross , involving a dormant commerce clause challenge to a California law prohibiting the sale of pork unless the pigs from which it was made (virtually all of which come from outside the state) were raised consistent with the state’s restrictive standards. That’s all for this week. Until next time, stay safe ! New Relist. Texas , 21-6001.

Stare Decisis 97

Stare Decisis Court Felony Statute 97

HowAppealing

DECEMBER 22, 2021

“The Truth About Stare Decisis: Justice Kavanaugh presented a view of precedent that centers on republican self-government.” ” Andy Smarick has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog.

Stare Decisis 100

Stare Decisis Government Laws 100

LawSites

JUNE 2, 2022

I also deleted all the footnotes and the draft’s two appendices, which list state laws, leaving just the primary text and citations. ” A central issue in the public debate about this draft is that of stare decisis — the principle that courts should adhere to precedent.

Drafting 98

Drafting Stare Decisis Legal Legal 98

Patently O

JUNE 29, 2021

In my property law course, I spend a good bit of time walking through post-conveyance rights and obligations. These ideas of stare decisis and silent reenactment are part of a major ongoing debate within the Court over its role in changing its own prior precedent. = = = =. by Dennis Crouch. Minerva Surgical Inc. Hologic Inc.

Stare Decisis 90

Stare Decisis Court Litigation Litigating 90

The Crime Report

DECEMBER 5, 2023

agree with the dissenting judges below. Andrus’ case cries out for intervention, and it is particularly vital that this Court act when necessary to protect against defiance of its precedents.

Stare Decisis 122

Stare Decisis Court Attorney Court Decisions 122

SCOTUSBlog

SEPTEMBER 1, 2021

Share Mary Ziegler is a law professor at Florida State University and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. 8 , the Texas law, added a new wrinkle to the so-called heartbeat laws that have become standard fare in conservative states. Wade to the Present.

Stare Decisis 121

Stare Decisis Court Laws Court Rules 121

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 1, 2021

” The court’s second example concerned a change in the law. If a previously valid patent becomes invalid due to a change in the law, “no principle of consistency prevents the assignor from saying so.”. In carving out this limitation, Kagan cited Mark Lemley’s influential article, “ Rethinking Assignor Estoppel.”

Stare Decisis 102

Stare Decisis Court Rules Court Manufacturing 102

The Crime Report

MAY 18, 2021

That not only amounts to a reversal of a precedent set earlier by the Court, but is an “alarming” step back in protecting juveniles, say Arthur Ago and Rochelle Swartz of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia have banned life in prison without parole for children under state law.

Court Decisions 98

Court Decisions Stare Decisis Court Court Rules 98

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 18, 2023

Federal law bars employers from discriminating against workers for practicing their religion unless the employer can show that the worker’s religious practice cannot “reasonably” be accommodated without “undue hardship.” That case law, Prelogar contended, “provides meaningful protection to religious observants.”

Stare Decisis 102

Stare Decisis Statute Court Laws 102

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 15, 2021

Smith , a 1990 decision holding that the free exercise clause does not provide a right to religious exemptions from general laws, or (2) sharply limit the impact of Smith by interpreting it as guaranteeing a “most favored nation” status for religious exemption claims.

Stare Decisis 143

Stare Decisis Court Government Sports 143

Constitutional Law Reporter

DECEMBER 27, 2021

However, in defending its controversial abortion law, the State of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn its prior decisions in Roe v. Board of Education, in which the Court overruled precedent and established new constitutional law. The i ssue in Dobbs v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v.

Stare Decisis 59

Stare Decisis Court Compensatory Damages Statute 59

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 3, 2022

However, in defending its controversial abortion law, the State of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn its prior decisions in Roe v. Board of Education, in which the Court overruled precedent and established new constitutional law. The i ssue in Dobbs v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v.

Stare Decisis 52

Stare Decisis Court Compensatory Damages Statute 52

The Crime Report

APRIL 8, 2022

We also have a much higher rate of plea bargain cases than the rest of the world: almost 20 percent higher than just about any other common law country. However, after the industrial revolution [and the rise of] the English working classes, there just weren’t enough police to keep whacking people over the head with the criminal law.

Stare Decisis 139

Stare Decisis Lawyer Lawyers Legal 139

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 12, 2022

Cogdill is the latest in a long line of petitions urging the Supreme Court to revisit its jurisprudence under the “qualified immunity” doctrine, which grants law enforcement officials immunity from civil suits for violating constitutional rights if those rights were not “clearly established” at the time they acted.

Stare Decisis 110

Stare Decisis Court Statute Litigation 110

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 18, 2022

He contends that “a clear statute does not stand on the same footing as an invalid regulation purporting to implement it” because “[t]he statute is law; the regulation is not.” In particular, George points to House and Senate committee reports that endorse case law from the U.S.

Statute 105

Statute Stare Decisis Government Contract 105

Patently O

DECEMBER 11, 2022

Another important feature of collateral estoppel is that it applies to both issues of fact and law. Although some courts have disagreed on this point, precedent is only binding for questions of law. In my view, Judge Alsup’s conclusion is wrong on the merits. Uniloc v. .” ” Id.

Stare Decisis 131

Stare Decisis Court Decisions Litigation Litigating 131

Above The Law

MAY 9, 2022

The post Nothing Is A Better Distraction From A Nakedly Political Court Than A Totally Important Game Of Whodunit appeared first on Above the Law. Then it’s hockey and we start punching.'.

Court 98

Court Stare Decisis Laws 98

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 7, 2022

The point is only that the case is protected by the same principles of a stare decisis as other cases, which affords protection to precedent but does not make such cases inviolate. There is nothing disingenuous in saying that a case is not super-precedent but still might not be overturned.

Stare Decisis 57

Stare Decisis Court Education Legal 57

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

Natural Resources Defense Council , holding that courts should defer to a federal agency’s interpretation of the laws it administers if those laws are ambiguous. The veteran, Thomas Buffington, initially served for eight years and received disability benefits for tinnitus after leaving the Air Force.

Stare Decisis 76

Stare Decisis Court Rules Court Government 76

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 11, 2022

In addition, the Supreme Court held a few years back that the appointment procedures for SEC administrative law judges violate the Constitution’s appointments clause. relisted after the April 29 conference). Returning Relists. Texas , 21-6001.

Stare Decisis 79

Stare Decisis Administrative Law Statute Government 79