JURIST

FEBRUARY 4, 2021

In a unanimous decision on Wednesday, the US Supreme Court ruled that the heirs of Jewish art dealers cannot bring a lawsuit in US courts against Germany over the alleged forced sale of art and artifacts under the Nazi regime. The Court directed the lower court to reconsider the case in light of the opinion in Germany v.

Court Rules 194

Court Rules Court Statute Laws 194

HowAppealing

FEBRUARY 6, 2023

And Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times reports that “ Federal judge suggests national right to abortion exists after Supreme Court ruling; Clinton appointee questions whether 13th Amendment protects national right to abortion.” ” You can access today’s ruling of the U.S.

Court Rules 100

Court Rules Court 100

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

Ironically, the District was behind some of the greatest losses for gun control advocates. In District of Columbia v. Heller , the Supreme Court in 2008 ruled the right to bear arms is an individual right. City of Chicago , the court ruled that this right applied against the states. Then, in Wrenn v.

Court Rules 40

Court Rules Court Government Laws 40

JURIST

AUGUST 9, 2023

Additionally, the stay will remain in effect pending the disposition of the case if a writ of certiorari is timely sought by a petition to the US Supreme Court. The court initially stayed the district court ruling on July 28 and later extended the stay until Tuesday. Such term does not include an antique firearm.

Court 197

Court Manufacturing Court Rules 197

The Crime Report

DECEMBER 5, 2022

10, 2022, a judge in the Western District of Texas struck down the federal law that prohibits access to guns for people subject to domestic violence protection orders. Supreme Court ruling, NYSRPA v. He did this based on a 2022 U.S.

Court Rules 105

Court Rules Court Legal Legal 105

JURIST

JUNE 21, 2021

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Friday upheld the dismissal of Alexander Khochinsky’s suit against Poland for seeking his extradition over his possession of a painting allegedly taken from Poland by Nazi troops.

Court 220

Court Tort Court Rules Legal 220

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 1, 2023

Natural Resources Defense Council , the Supreme Court ruled that courts should defer to a federal agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute as long as that interpretation is reasonable. On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to reconsider its ruling in Chevron. Share Nearly 40 years ago, in Chevron v.

Compensatory Damages 144

Compensatory Damages Court Statute Court Rules 144

Chugh LLP

SEPTEMBER 15, 2021

According to the US District Court for the District of Columbia, DOS may not use the prioritization guidance to block any embassy, consular, or administrative processing center from reviewing a 2021 diversity visa. This Diversity Visa court ruling should lead to faster DV-2021 application processing.

Court 52

Court Immigration Contract Court Rules 52

The Crime Report

JUNE 25, 2021

More than two dozen states — including Massachusetts — and the District of Columbia have already disallowed putting juveniles behind bars for life with no chance at parole.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Court Attorney Laws 52

The Crime Report

SEPTEMBER 14, 2021

In 2009, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that, based on prior court rulings, there had been a “clearly established” right not to be shackled during labor since September 2003. The District of Columbia and 31 U.S.

Laws 144

Laws Government Court Rules Court 144

LawSites

JULY 19, 2022

With the acquisition, Fastcase became the sole legal research provider for the bar associations of all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the U.S. He described the service as a basic research service with cases, statutes, administrative materials and court rules. million lawyers in the country.

Legal Research 98

Legal Research Legal Legal Lawyer 98

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 3, 2022

attorney for the Southern District of New York, and he asked his clerks for their thoughts because he “believed in us.” Corinne Beckwith, a judge on the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, said that Stevens was “unwaveringly open-minded,” and wanted to consider a range of views “including, for some reason, ours.”.

Court 87

Court Drafting Court Rules Attorney 87

JonathanTurley

JUNE 23, 2022

In 2008, the Supreme Court recognized the right to bear arms as an individual right in District of Columbia v. City of Chicago , the court ruled that this right applied against the states. Two years after Heller, in McDonald v. This case concerned concealed-carry restrictions under N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f)

Court 51

Court Court Rules Litigation Litigating 51

The Crime Report

MAY 18, 2021

The decision follows multiple previous precedents set by the Court over the past decade that sharply limited courts’ ability to sentence a juvenile offender to life in prison without parole, the lawyers wrote. Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia have banned life in prison without parole for children under state law.

Court Decisions 98

Court Decisions Stare Decisis Court Court Rules 98

The Crime Report

JUNE 16, 2022

All 50 states and the District of Columbia allow “initial aggressor” limitations on self-defense claims. Concealed carry is allowed in all 50 states, and a Supreme Court ruling is expected shortly in a New York case about whether individuals have a Second Amendment right to carry guns openly in self-defense.

Law School 105

Law School Court Statute Laws 105

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 15, 2023

Nineteen other states and the District of Columbia have similar laws. In the same year, a divided Supreme Court ruled in National Institute for Family and Life Advocates v.

Cause of Action 76

Cause of Action Tort Court Laws 76

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2022

Louisiana , the Supreme Court ruled that states could only convict defendants of serious offenses with a unanimous jury verdict. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed , declining to adopt the approach in an opinion by then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Attorney 103

Attorney Law Firm Law Firms Legal 103

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 21, 2022

International Finance Corporation , the Supreme Court faces another issue under the FSIA in a case that is back before the justices after they remanded it to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in early 2019.

Finance 79

Finance Diligence Court Construction 79

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 1, 2021

The district court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected these claims on the ground that the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause prohibits judicial review of legislative actions such as voting. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., In McCarthy v. In Skinner v.

Statute 100

Statute Court Laws Court Rules 100

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 5, 2021

The United States Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (and the later denial of a motion for consideration ) in rejecting the much touted lawsuit to give residents a vote in Congress. I have written about D.C.

Court 40

Court Court Reporting Education Court Reporter 40

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 28, 2021

Despite the threat they pose to their victims and their communities, District of Columbia v. However, local law enforcement officials who have responded again and again to violence perpetrated by the same individuals know these abusers. The value of local knowledge must not be discounted when considering public safety needs.

Misdemeanor 89

Misdemeanor Laws Court Court Rules 89

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 15, 2021

Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that the case could proceed. District of Columbia v. In Facebook v. Davis , the company asks the justices to review and reverse the 9th Circuit’s decision. Heller held that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess firearms at home.

Misdemeanor 114

Misdemeanor Court Felony Government 114

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 4, 2021

Yesterday’s oral argument appeared to confirm the expectations in those columns on the likely reversal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and a reinforcement of Second Amendment rights. In 2008, the Supreme Court recognized the right to bear arms as an individual right in District of Columbia v.

Court 38

Court Laws Court Rules Constitutional Law 38

JURIST

JULY 10, 2023

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Friday upheld a law that combats online child sex trafficking called the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017 (FOSTA). The case is an appeal from the US District Court for the District of Columbia.

Laws 287

Laws Court Felony Court Rules 287

JURIST

JUNE 26, 2022

In October 2021, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the US “no longer has a legal basis to justify the continued detention,” having found that Gul had been an HIA member but not that of Al-Qaeda. The court ordered his release.

Government 197

Government Law Firm Law Firms Lawyer 197

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 2, 2021

That is evident from the fact that it was not until 2008 that the Supreme Court finally recognized the right to bear arms as an individual right in District of Columbia v. City of Chicago , the court ruled that this right applied against the states. Two years after Heller, in McDonald v.

Court 44

Court Laws Court Rules Constitutional Law 44

Conflict of Laws

MARCH 12, 2024

In an earlier blogpost we reported that the Amsterdam District Court ruled that it had international jurisdiction under the Brussels I-bis Regulation and the GDPR. The settlement addressed issues very similar to those raised in this case, as explicitly outlined in the agreement.

Litigation 52

Litigation Litigating Court Finance 52

JURIST

APRIL 22, 2023

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday that abortion pill mifepristone will continue to be widely accessible as the ongoing appeals process takes place. The Supreme Court ruling keeps mifepristone widely available during ongoing litigation. Mifepristone, approved in 2000, is used broadly to end pregnancies.

Court 104

Court Court Rules Litigation Litigating 104

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 11, 2024

An Oregon-based timber company went to federal court in Oregon to challenge the monument’s expansion. Meanwhile, a trade association representing the Pacific Northwest timber industry went to federal court in the District of Columbia with a similar challenge. But the D.C. On appeal, the U.S. United States and Murphy Co.

Government 123

Government Statute Court Laws 123

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Federal Court Said NOAA Justified Redaction of Communications Between Climate Scientist and White House During Obama Administration.

Court 54

Court Government Litigation Litigating 54

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 6, 2017

Thirteen states, the District of Columbia, and the City of Chicago sought leave to intervene on behalf of the petitioners. The district court ruled that EPA was required to conduct such evaluations in October 2016 and set an expedited schedule for EPA’s compliance. Department of the Interior Secretarial Order No.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Attorney 40

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 27, 2021

Share In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that public school officials can regulate speech that would substantially disrupt the school’s work. On Wednesday, the justices will consider whether Tinker also applies to speech by students that occurs off campus.

Court 105

Court Government Education Court Rules 105

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 8, 2021

Oklahoma , the Supreme Court ruled that the eastern half of Oklahoma remains “Indian country” for purposes of the Major Crimes Act , meaning that the federal government, not the state, has authority for prosecuting Native Americans for major crimes committed on reservations. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit upheld the CADA.

Laws 83

Laws Court Court Rules Felony 83

JonathanTurley

JUNE 4, 2022

The reference may be to this Scalia quote from the District of Columbia v.Heller decision: There seems to us no doubt, on the basis of both text and history, that the Second Amendment conferred an individual right to keep and bear arms.

Litigation 37

Litigation Litigating Laws Court 37

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in the District Court for the District of Columbia has caused a bit of a stir after a hearing in a criminal case where she called for briefing on the alternative grounds for the right to an abortion.

Court 45

Court Laws Statute Contract 45

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 18, 2021

The case promises to be a showdown between the Supreme Court and lower courts, which have been chipping away at the high court’s prior Second Amendment rulings. In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. Two years after Heller, in McDonald v.

Court 42

Court Litigation Litigating Laws 42

Broadcast Law Blog

APRIL 22, 2015

Instead, seemingly the only thing that would slow the auction would be an adverse result in the appeals of the auction rules filed by Sinclair Broadcasting and the NAB – appeals that have been briefed and argued in front of the US Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia.

Drafting 46

Drafting Court Rules Court 46