article thumbnail

The “Buffalo Billion” plan and Montana easement cases

SCOTUSBlog

Andrew Cuomo launched the “Buffalo Billion” plan, a program to invest one billion dollars in development projects in upstate New York, for which LPCiminelli won a $750 million contract to build a high-tech facility in Buffalo. The post The “Buffalo Billion” plan and Montana easement cases appeared first on SCOTUSblog. In the U.S.

Statute 90
article thumbnail

Case of the Day: Ford v. Montana

LettersBlogatory

Montana Eighth Jud icial District Court (S. While “arising out of” relates to causation, “relating to” has to do with relationships that are sufficient even without causation: Ford “enjoys the benefits and protection of [the state’s] laws”—the enforcement of contracts, the defense of property, the resulting formation of effective markets.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

How Can a Labor Attorney Help Set Up a Business in Montana?

LegalReader

A business needs to be formally incorporated in its early stages. This is done for a number of reasons, such as tax purposes, the ability to transfer ownership, and limiting the liability of the ownership.

article thumbnail

Water and electric quarrels test the limits of tribal power

SCOTUSBlog

These rights flow from the original treaties that tribes negotiated with Congress as well as modern contracts between tribal members and non-members. Further north, the Crow Reservation spans a large section of southeastern Montana along the border with Wyoming. The court in Montana v. Navajo Nation. 101 Houseco, LLC v.

article thumbnail

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 4/2021: Abstracts

Conflict of Laws

Supreme Court decision in March 2021 in Ford vs. Montana now permits the exercise of specific jurisdiction when the claim arises out of or is (sufficiently) “related” to the defendant’s in-state contacts and activities. It was often assumed that the claim must have “arisen out of” the defendant’s forum contacts: what did that mean?

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Renders Personal Jurisdiction Decision

Conflict of Laws

In Pennsylvania Fire , that Missouri statute was invoked to establish jurisdiction over a Pennsylvania insurance company regarding a contract formed in Colorado to insure a Colorado facility owned by an Arizona company. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court (2021).

Court 40
article thumbnail

US federal judge allows Oklahoma ban on gender-affirming care for minors to take effect

JURIST

Judge Hein rejected this claim by citing numerous cases to summarize ways in which “American law” restricted minors from entering contracts, being held criminally liable and purchasing certain goods. The ruling shows a growing divide in the federal court system on how to approach gender-affirming care bans.

Contract 223