article thumbnail

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 4/2021: Abstracts

Conflict of Laws

Supreme Court decision in March 2021 in Ford vs. Montana now permits the exercise of specific jurisdiction when the claim arises out of or is (sufficiently) “related” to the defendant’s in-state contacts and activities. The long-awaited U.S. Wurmnest: International Jurisdiction in Abuse of Dominance Cases.

article thumbnail

July 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Second Circuit said the Connecticut statutes authorizing the solicitations did not compel utilities to enter into contracts with specific bidders. Supreme Court determined was preempted in Hughes v. Environmental Groups Filed NEPA Challenge of Montana Coal Mine Expansion. ADDITION TO THE NON-U.S. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART.

Court 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

October 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Montana Supreme Court Affirmed that Public Service Commission Improperly Rewrote Terms of Solar Project PPA, Including by Eliminating Carbon Adder. The district court held, among other things, that elimination of the carbon adder was arbitrary and capricious and directed the PSC to assign a price for carbon. 4:19-cv-00362 (E.D.

Court 72
article thumbnail

September 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Ninth Circuit declined, however, to take a position on whether the underlying cases were moot in their entirety and also declined to vacate any district court decisions. The federal district court for the District of Montana is to consider these issues on remand. Northern Plains Resource Council v. 20-35412 (9th Cir.

article thumbnail

March 2018 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision that vacated the listing of the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Jacobson’s lawsuit asserted defamation, breach of contract, and promissory estoppel claims.

Court 40