article thumbnail

Conversion claim was time-barred due to plaintiffs’ constructive notice of claim.

Day on Torts

In its analysis, the Court of Appeals ruled that plaintiffs had constructive notice of their claim in October 2009. Under the modern discovery rule…, Plaintiffs were on constructive notice of their claim by October 5, 2009. On appeal, this ruling was reversed. Conversion is subject to a three-year statute of limitations. Code Ann. §

article thumbnail

Premises liability summary judgment affirmed based on lack of constructive notice.

Day on Torts

Where premises liability plaintiffs could not show that defendant church, who was renting the property to another church, had constructive notice of a downed power line on the property that had most likely been down for approximately 26 hours, summary judgment was affirmed. In Kelly v. internal citation omitted). internal citation omitted).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Reschedule Watch: Birthright citizenship and torts to members of the armed forces

SCOTUSBlog

United States , the 1950 Supreme Court case holding that the United States is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries sustained by members of the armed forces while on active duty and resulting from the negligence of others in the armed forces. United States. The case involves the so-called Feres doctrine, after Feres v.

Tort 96
article thumbnail

Plaintiff could not show constructive notice in GTLA premises liability case where she could not show how long dangerous condition had existed.

Day on Torts

Where plaintiff tripped on an uneven sidewalk and brought a GTLA premises liability suit against defendant city, plaintiff could not show constructive notice because she could not show how long the condition had existed. Plaintiff attempted to prove constructive notice through two theories. In Mitchell v. Code Ann. § 29-20-203(b).

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines North Carolina appeal in undercover investigations case

JURIST

The US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from North Carolina on Monday over the constitutionality of a state law allowing employers to sue employees working as undercover investigators. The court stated that the law substantially “burden[ed] newsgathering and publishing activities.”

article thumbnail

Guest Post: Climate Litigation in Japan: Citizens’ Attempts for the Coal Phase-Out

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Japan , their case challenging the legality of a governmental approval that allows for the construction and operation of new coal-fired power plants. Through May 2022, all existing climate litigation cases in Japan concern the construction or operation of coal-fired power plants and refer to citizens’ attempts to stop the use of coal.

article thumbnail

Summary judgment affirmed where defendant did not place structure creating nuisance on defendant’s easement.

Day on Torts

Where the State had an easement on plaintiff’s property for the construction and maintenance of a drainage facility, but plaintiff had no evidence that the faulty concrete structure causing flooding on his property was installed by the State, summary judgment on his nuisance claim was affirmed. In Walker v. State , No.

Tort 59