article thumbnail

US Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Jan. 6 Capitol attack obstruction case

JURIST

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday concerning obstruction of justice charges in cases related to the January 6 riots at the US Capitol building in 2020. Several justices, including the court’s conservative bloc, expressed skepticism with the government’s broad reading of 18 U.S.C. ” Jeffrey T.

Statute 211
article thumbnail

India Supreme Court outlines requirements for state acquisition of private property

JURIST

The Supreme Court of India ruled Thursday that any acquisition of private property by the state must meet a set of criteria under Article 300A of India’s Constitution, which includes being carried out for a public purpose, following the law, and following proper procedure. This incident prompted Shah to petition the Calcutta High Court.

Court 211
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SCOTUS dispatch: government lawyer grilled for an hour on meaning of federal corruption statute

JURIST

That question kept Colleen Sinzdak, counsel for the US government, busy for almost all of her argument before the US Supreme Court earlier today. This case asks the Supreme Court to decide whether 18 U.S.C. § The party briefs mostly focused on the word “rewarded” in the statute. United States.

Statute 129
article thumbnail

Supreme Court cabins reach of aggravated identity theft statute

SCOTUSBlog

Choosing between the two competing readings, “one limited and one near limitless,” the Supreme Court on Thursday handily rejected the government’s “boundless” interpretation of the aggravated identity theft statute. The government also charged Dubin with aggravated identity theft, which carries a separate two-year sentence.

Statute 77
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines North Carolina appeal in undercover investigations case

JURIST

The US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from North Carolina on Monday over the constitutionality of a state law allowing employers to sue employees working as undercover investigators. The challenged statute, N.C. The court stated that the law substantially “burden[ed] newsgathering and publishing activities.”

article thumbnail

Court holds statute of limitations under Quiet Title Act is not a jurisdictional bar

SCOTUSBlog

United States broke no new ground, as it followed a steady line of cases applying a rule under which time limits in federal statutes do not create jurisdictional bars unless the statute makes that intent clear. Share Tuesday’s decision in Wilkins v. So, if the bar is jurisdictional, they would be completely out of luck.

Statute 94
article thumbnail

Justices wrestle with statute of limitations in Rodney Reed’s effort to revive DNA lawsuit

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard the case of a Texas death-row inmate seeking DNA testing for evidence that he believes will clear him. A federal appeals court threw out Rodney Reed’s federal civil rights lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Texas law governing DNA testing, explaining that Reed had filed his suit too late.

Statute 125