supreme-court-will-hear-election-law-case-with-standing-issue 
At the Lectern
JUNE 24, 2021
Actions of note at yesterday’s Supreme Court conference included: Supreme Court signs off on another sentence commutation. The court granted review in Travis v. The court apparently didn’t care for the way the First District, Division Two, procedurally handled the habeas corpus petition in In re Murray.
JURIST
SEPTEMBER 3, 2022
Friday was the final hearing day for the presidential election petition before the Supreme Court of Kenya. The Supreme Court’s agenda for the day was listening to the answers given by both the respondents and petitioners to outstanding questions judges had asked both sides. She reports from Nairobi.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
DECEMBER 13, 2021
Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which involves a Mississippi law that makes most abortions illegal after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Given that the state has expressly asked the Court to overturn its landmark decisions in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MARCH 21, 2022
Supreme Court held that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred in denying the Kentucky attorney general’s motion to intervene on the commonwealth’s behalf in litigation concerning Kentucky House Bill 454, the state’s controversial abortion law. Facts of the Case. Supreme Court’s Decision.
LawTechnologyToday
SEPTEMBER 1, 2021
The coronavirus known as COVID-19 forcefully ushered the judiciary into the digital world, taking along with it many legal practitioners who may have resisted technology invading their law office. But there is no longer an aegis protecting lawyers from technology and how they will need to interact with the court now and in the future.
The Crime Report
DECEMBER 1, 2022
Louis’ extreme, particularly as a response to petty incidents, according to experts in law enforcement. But a court struck down the practice as a violation of the constitutional freedoms of association and movement, and the U.S. Supreme Court in 2003 let that ruling stand. But few have taken the practice to St.
The Crime Report
DECEMBER 30, 2021
percent of cases. It was conjured out of thin air by the Supreme Court in 1976, with no basis in the Constitution, simply because in the Court’s opinion it was “better” to relieve good prosecutors of “the constant dread of retaliation” than to recognize some means for sanctioning the bad ones and providing compensation to their victims.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
49 
Let's personalize your content