article thumbnail

Tennessee statute of limitations is based on gravamen of complaint.

Day on Torts

Where plaintiff’s claims against defendant county were based on intentional torts, a one-year statute of limitations applied. Plaintiff’s initial complaint listed several intentional torts, but his amended complaint removed the referral to any specific torts and instead alleged liability more generally. In Anderson v.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

No exception to products liability statute of repose for latent disease or fraudulent concealment.

Day on Torts

Where plaintiff filed a products liability claim based on a hip replacement device she had received, but her hip replacement occurred more than ten years before her suit was filed, dismissal based on the statute of repose was affirmed. The statute of repose for products liability cases is a hard line with very limited exceptions.

Statute 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Summary judgment based on GTLA and Recreational Use Statute affirmed.

Day on Torts

Where defendant governmental entity did not own the park where plaintiff was injured, and plaintiff was attending a concert in the park when she fell, summary judgment based on both the GTLA and Recreational Use Statute was affirmed. The Court next turned to whether summary judgment was appropriate under the Recreational Use Statutes.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

A Court-Side Seat: SCOTUS Further Clarifies Alien Tort Statute; Revisiting WOTUS

Gravel2Gavel

The federal government depends on the service of thousands of Administrative Law Judges (ALJs), most of whom are appointed or selected by the head of an agency or internal agency boards.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Summary Judgment Based on Tennessee Recreational Use Statute Affirmed.

Day on Torts

First, the Claims Commissioner ruled that the claim was “barred by § 70-7-102(a) of Tennessee’s Recreational Use Statute, which protects landowners, including the State of Tennessee, from responsibility for injury to recreational visitors.” In Victory v. State , No. M2020-01610-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

Claim regarding retirement benefit calculation was not a tort claim.

Day on Torts

Although plaintiff labeled his complaint as a tort claim, the gravamen of the complaint was a dispute over “the amount, time and manner of payment of plaintiff’s pension plan benefits.” This case is fairly fact specific, but it is a reminder that a plaintiff cannot change the gravamen of a complaint simply by labeling it as a tort case.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Pakistan dispatch: monsoons prompt concerns about official negligence aggravating environmental devastation

JURIST

There is no parliamentary statute, like the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 in the UK and Federal Torts Claims Act 1946 in the USA, that provides citizens the right to pursue tortious remedies against the government, nor is there any clear precedent set by the superior courts of the country that establishes the same.

Tort 197