article thumbnail

Who’ll Shoot First? How Relaxed Gun Rules Fuel a ‘Small Arms Race’

The Crime Report

Vigilante Justice Firearm Laws. The law professors detail that the small arms race arises from three main “troubling” legal implications, and it’s looking at the examples of Wisconsin and Georgia’s laws that “exemplify this perilous confluence.”. Legal Solutions.

Sports 137
article thumbnail

Murder, They Wrote: Bush and Tlaib Publish Column Accusing Police of Covering Up Killing of Protester

JonathanTurley

They claim that the evidence shows that “Georgia State Patrol officers shot and killed Manuel ‘Tortuguita’ Terán, a nonviolent activist” after one officer accidentally killed another. 18 incident was bought legally in September 2020 by Manuel Esteban Paez Teran.”

Legal 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Assault or Self Defense? The Arrest of Former Broncos Player Raises Tough Legal Questions

JonathanTurley

However, the law also states that, except for a couple of limiting provisions, “a person employing protective force may estimate the necessity of using force when the force is used, without retreating, surrendering possession, doing any other act which he has no legal duty to do or abstaining from any lawful action.”

Legal 38
article thumbnail

Are Victims of Police Shootings Entitled to Crime Victims’ Compensation?

The Crime Report

The paper’s author, Valena Elizabeth Beety, a professor at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, argues that as current legislation stands, VCFs automatically disqualify victims of police shootings and their families because of who the perpetrator is. “A Who is a Victim? .

Laws 138
article thumbnail

With historical promises in mind, justices weigh state criminal jurisdiction in Indian country

SCOTUSBlog

As a result, most of eastern Oklahoma is now understood to be Indian country — a development that, according to the state, has disrupted the criminal justice system there. Castro-Huerta ’s legal issues are narrower than those in McGirt. Georgia (1832). federal enclaves).

article thumbnail

In sequel to McGirt, justices will again review scope of state prosecutorial power in Indian country

SCOTUSBlog

Oklahoma , the most monumental federal Indian law decision of the new century. The legal issue is whether states possess criminal jurisdiction over crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians within Indian reservations concurrent with the federal government’s power.

article thumbnail

Arbery Trial Judge Delivers Massive Blow to the Defense on the Eve of Closing Statements

JonathanTurley

In the Georgia trial over the killing of Ahmaud Arbery, Judge Timothy Walmsley delivered a haymaker to the defense on the very eve of closing statements. The court ruled that Georgia’s prior citizen’s arrest law is only applicable if a person sees a felony committed and acts without delay. Here is the prior law: O.C.G.A.

Felony 42