At the Lectern

MARCH 1, 2023

The Supreme Court today agreed to answer this question posed by the Ninth Circuit in Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. of California’s Supreme Court, part 2

Court 63

Court Entertainment Court Rules Litigation 63

At the Lectern

MAY 26, 2021

Today’s administrative order announcing the new policy says the court “will not entertain such a motion if filed after a clemency record has been returned to the Governor,” which happens when the court makes an affirmative clemency recommendation. (Pen. See rule 8.45 Superior Court (1999) 20 Cal.4th

Court 85

Court Entertainment Felony Court Rules 85

Conflict of Laws

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

Enhanced and vital interpretation of “Carrying on Business” The court’s jurisdiction in the present case was established under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 , which permits a plaintiff to file a suit in the court’s jurisdiction where it carries on business. Building on this, in Impresario Entertainment v.

Cause of Action 67

Cause of Action Court Entertainment Court Rules 67

The IP Law Blog

JUNE 16, 2023

Supreme Court ruled in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith that Andy Warhol’s portrait of music legend Prince did not qualify as fair use under copyright law. Scott Hervey and Tara Sattler talk about this decision on this episode of The Briefing by the IP Law Blog. Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel here.

Laws 52

Laws Court Rules Court Entertainment 52

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 4, 2022

Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The ALJ imposed a substantial monetary penalty and barred her from practice before the SEC, but the decision was vacated after the Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v.

Statute 110

Statute Court Entertainment Administrative Law 110

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

Share In what was only the second opinion day of the 2022-23 term, the Supreme Court delivered a rare win for a criminally convicted petitioner and offered a clarifying example of when it is appropriate for a federal court to intervene when a state court fails to apply federal law. In a 5-4 decision in Cruz v. Arizona in 2016.

Court 113

Court Entertainment Laws Court Rules 113

The IP Law Blog

MAY 25, 2023

Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Andy Warhol’s portraits of music legend Prince did not qualify as fair use under copyright law. The decision affirms a previous ruling by the Second Circuit, which found that Warhol’s artwork shared the same commercial purpose as the original photograph taken by photographer Lynn Goldsmith.

Court 98

Court Court Rules Laws Entertainment 98

Constitutional Law Reporter

JULY 12, 2023

Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. According to the eight-member majority, “federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions.”

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Rules Court Entertainment 52

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

In this case, it is two forms of bingo at the Pueblo tribe’s Speaking Rock Entertainment Center near El Paso, Texas, that is primarily at issue. (It was one of Scalia’s top quips in a SCOTUSblog compilation after the justice died six years ago this month.). Two, you cover those numbers when they are drawn or somehow identified.

Entertainment 108

Entertainment Court Statute Laws 108

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 9, 2021

Despite this history, a new decision out of the High Court is still shocking in its implications for further attacks on free speech. The court ruled that newspapers and television stations that post articles on social media sites like Facebook are liable for other third party comments on those posts. America Online, Inc.,

Tort 34

Tort Court Compensatory Damages Punitive Damages 34

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 18, 2021

The companies suggest that their interpretation is consistent with the Supreme Court’s cases interpreting three other statutes allowing review of district court orders, in which the court ruled that an appeals court can review both “the particular aspect of the order that permitted the appeal” and also “any other issues encompassed in the order.”

Statute 135

Statute Court Reporting Court Court Reporter 135

MyCase

AUGUST 16, 2022

The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain court rules on retirement.”. According to Law.com , attorney retirement in New York is “remarkably complex” with “variations of ‘retire’… used in different contexts.”

Lawyer 52

Lawyer Lawyers Law Firm Law Firms 52

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 24, 2020

Beshear has correctly cited a major victory recently before the Kentucky Supreme Court — an unanimous decision in favor of his authority to issue pandemic orders. On November 12, 2020, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the authority of the governor to issue pandemic orders.

Attorney 31

Attorney Litigation Litigating Entertainment 31

Patently O

MARCH 19, 2021

Moreover, individual court rules are now requiring greater transparency. The Federal Circuit’s latest rules clearly seek to maximize public disclosure. In each filing, Rule 25.1(d) In each filing, Rule 25.1(d) As Silicon Valley’s home venue, the Northern District of California entertains numerous patent cases.

Law School 93

Law School Litigation Litigating Technology 93

JURIST

MARCH 9, 2022

The US Supreme Court Monday declined to review the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that overturned entertainer Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction. In 2005, former Temple University employee Andrea Constand alleged that Cosby had sexually assaulted and drugged her.

Court 104

Court Entertainment Court Decisions Attorney 104

JonathanTurley

JUNE 22, 2021

The Commission advised them if possible, to “educate yourself on the harm it may cause Seattle’s BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color) in your pursuit of a free ticket to an event that is not expressly meant for you and your entertainment.” ” In 2014, the Court ruled 6-2 in Schuette v.

Education 39

Education Entertainment Contract Laws 39

JonathanTurley

JUNE 17, 2022

It did not entertain the possibility that the violence was not an effort to overthrow the nation but, instead, a riot. Despite support by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), a court ruled against Home Depot workers who claimed a right to wear Black Lives Matter symbols at work.

Entertainment 61

Entertainment Legal Legal Government 61

At the Lectern

DECEMBER 14, 2023

At its conference yesterday, a double one, the Supreme Court ruled on a robust 164 matters. The court granted review in EpicentRx, Inc. HDI Global Insurance Company is another grant-and-hold for Another Planet Entertainment v. Actions of note included: Forum selection. Justice Groban wrote, “I.

Misdemeanor 45

Misdemeanor Court Entertainment Felony 45

Broadcast Law Blog

JULY 9, 2015

That’s because it is assumed that the use of this device is to keep the employees entertained. But they can have only one such device. Under this exception, the source of the content is not an issue. But it allows for the use of only a single radio or TV. A newer exception adopted in the 1990s goes further.

Entertainment 70

Entertainment Court Rules Laws Attorney 70

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 7, 2022

It is hard not to see that listing as an obvious effort to do precisely what Hochul said: to recreate the ban by including virtually every location as a “sensitive area.”.

Court Rules 48

Court Rules Laws Court Education 48

JonathanTurley

MAY 24, 2022

Now, after a major court ruling against the university , an arbitrator has awarded Negy all back pay and benefits from the time of his firing. To the contrary, the university issued a statement that indicated that it is undeterred by the adverse court rulings. That is good news.

Education 7

Education Court Rules Entertainment Lawyer 7

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

Like most states, Michigan courts’ rules for evidence — adopted from the Daubert standard, which was named after a Supreme Court decision issued almost 30 years ago — say trial judges are responsible for making sure expert testimony has a reliable foundation. Riley said again and again that he thought his brother was dead.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 6, 2022

She filed a discrimination lawsuit in federal court under the Oregon Public Accommodations Act’s (“OPAA”) prohibition against discrimination on the basis of gender identity. The show would likely still be entertaining, but the context and the conversation would change. It’s a completely different show. 31, 2016, 12:30 PM), [link].

Entertainment 42

Entertainment Statute Court Court Rules 42

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 23, 2022

Nigrelli : where the court ruled that the private property exclusion violates the Second Amendment. New York responded roughly a week later with Senate Bill S51001 (June 30, 2022, Extraordinary Session). The new law created a target rich environment for new challenges. The new decision comes from Judge John Sinatra (W.D.N.Y.)

Laws 51

Laws Court Entertainment Sports 51

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 6, 2021

Brnovich is the latest in a line of cases suggesting that the federal courts should play a smaller role in the patrolling of how states administer elections. The court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. Common Cause said that federal courts should not entertain challenges to partisan gerrymandering under the Constitution.

Laws 104

Laws Court Contract Entertainment 104

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2021

Federal law allows federal courts to review a request for post-conviction relief only from someone who is “in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court,” the justices explained. The Supreme Court, Alito noted, “adopted this practice without even providing a convincing justification.”

Litigation 101

Litigation Litigating Government Court 101