This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.

Remove Cause of Action Remove Court Rules Remove Entertainment Related Topics
Compensatory Damages Punitive Damages Tort Constitutional Law Criminal Law Statute Law School Court Laws Lawyers More Related Topics >
article thumbnail

Navigating Global Jurisdiction: The Indian Courts’ Approach to Online IP Infringement

Conflict of Laws

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

Enhanced and vital interpretation of “Carrying on Business” The court’s jurisdiction in the present case was established under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 , which permits a plaintiff to file a suit in the court’s jurisdiction where it carries on business. Building on this, in Impresario Entertainment v.

Cause of Action 68
Cause of Action Court Entertainment Court Rules 68
article thumbnail

Australia High Court Delivers Major Blow to Free Speech In Defamation Ruling

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 9, 2021

Despite this history, a new decision out of the High Court is still shocking in its implications for further attacks on free speech. The court ruled that newspapers and television stations that post articles on social media sites like Facebook are liable for other third party comments on those posts. America Online, Inc.,

Tort 33
Tort Court Compensatory Damages Punitive Damages 33
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Stay Connected

Join 105,000+ Insiders by signing up for our newsletter

About
Awards
About
Editions
Awards
Editions
Topics
LinkedIn Twitter
Powered by Aggregage | Terms and Conditions | Your California Rights and Privacy Policy
© Aggregage 2024