SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 18, 2024
After Chutkan denied that request in December, it was Smith who came to the Supreme Court , asking the justices to weigh in on Trump’s claim to immunity without waiting for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to rule on Trump’s appeal. The justices denied that request on Dec.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 31, 2020
In June, the court ruled in R.G. & Before becoming clerk of the Supreme Court, Stevas was the clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and worked as an assistant U.S. He also taught criminal law and trial practice at the George Washington University School of Law.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
APRIL 19, 2021
While it is possible that members could find a trial judge to rule in their favor, these lawsuits should fail on appeal, if they get that far. Moreover, they would fail under a lower standard of proof than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in criminal law.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 17, 2022
After the riot, District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine announced that he was considering arresting Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Indeed, such a claim would contradict controlling Supreme Court precedent. There are other crimes that have been proven. Those are plenty to start with.”. Rudy Giuliani and U.S.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 26, 2022
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2002 to 2003. Circuit to the Supreme Court, where she clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens during the 2003-04 term. The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, unanimously rejected that position and held that the ministerial exception applied.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 25, 2022
Indeed, such a use of the speech would contradict controlling Supreme Court precedent. Again, the use of such a law would fail for the reasons above. The Criminal Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No. That does not change due to Trump’s speech before the riot. In Brandenburg v.
JonathanTurley
FEBRUARY 19, 2021
Such proclamations do better with MSNBC than the DDC (United States District Court for the District of Columbia). The public statements of Trump alone would not make for a credible case for criminal incitement under the controlling case law. The reason is that while the crime is not clear, the case law is.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
145 
Let's personalize your content