article thumbnail

Europe human rights court rules Hungary asylum criminal law violates EU law

JURIST

The NGO called for further action, stating, “Now Art 353/A needs to be repealed and the CJEU ruling fully respected.” ” The post Europe human rights court rules Hungary asylum criminal law violates EU law appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.

article thumbnail

Canada Supreme Court rules extreme intoxication a criminal defense

JURIST

In Daviault , the court ruled that a man who raped an elderly woman could use intoxication as a defense because he was in a “state akin to automatism.” ” On Friday, the court held that section 33.1 violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. “Section 33.1

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules Arizona death row inmate entitled to second post conviction relief petition

JURIST

The US Supreme Court Wednesday granted a request by death row inmate John Cruz for post conviction relief from his 2005 death sentence. In an opinion by Justice Sotomayor, the court ruled that the Arizona Supreme Court incorrectly held that the 2016 case Lynch v.

article thumbnail

India High Court rules online intermediaries immune from criminal prosecution for counterfeit goods

JURIST

.” The Court did not, however, bar further investigations for ascertaining the identity of infringing and unauthorised sellers on Flipkart’s platform. The post India High Court rules online intermediaries immune from criminal prosecution for counterfeit goods appeared first on JURIST - News.

article thumbnail

UK Supreme Court rules person under criminal investigation has reasonable expectation of privacy

JURIST

While it did rule in favor of ZXC, the court noted that this right did not extend once a person was charged with, and not merely being investigated for, an offence. The post UK Supreme Court rules person under criminal investigation has reasonable expectation of privacy appeared first on JURIST - News.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules against criminal defendant on habeas relief

JURIST

In the 1993 case of Brecht , the US Supreme Court said the test for a grant of habeas relief should be determined by whether the defendant suffered actual prejudice from a state-court error. Kagan described the majority holding as an unnecessary barrier to habeas courts and the parties before them.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules reckless offenses do not qualify as ‘violent felony’

JURIST

He wrote instead that the phrase is “a centuries-old term of art in the criminal law that distinguishes offenses against the person from offenses against property.” ” He also argued that the ordinary meaning of the phrase “encompasses reckless offenses.”

Felony 161