article thumbnail

Plaintiff could not show constructive notice in GTLA premises liability case where she could not show how long dangerous condition had existed.

Day on Torts

Where plaintiff tripped on an uneven sidewalk and brought a GTLA premises liability suit against defendant city, plaintiff could not show constructive notice because she could not show how long the condition had existed. 29-20-203, which “removes immunity for injury caused by government roadways and sidewalks under certain circumstances.”

article thumbnail

Intentional interference with business relationships under the GTLA.

Day on Torts

Further, while constructing a sewer line, the City inadvertently placed part of the line on plaintiffs’ property. This suit followed, asserting several contract and property claims, as well as a tort claim for intentional interference with business relationships. At issue here was Tenn. Code Ann. §

Tort 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Summary judgment affirmed where defendant did not place structure creating nuisance on defendant’s easement.

Day on Torts

Where the State had an easement on plaintiff’s property for the construction and maintenance of a drainage facility, but plaintiff had no evidence that the faulty concrete structure causing flooding on his property was installed by the State, summary judgment on his nuisance claim was affirmed. In Walker v. State , No.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Proper analysis for petition to dismiss under Tennessee Public Participation Act (TPPA).

Day on Torts

Rock Creek Construction, Inc. , 1, 2022), plaintiffs filed suit against defendant construction company related to defendant’s construction of plaintiffs’ residential home, and defendant filed a counterclaim, which was the claim at issue in this appeal. In Reiss v. E2021-01513-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 16559447 (Tenn.

article thumbnail

Summary judgment based on GTLA and Recreational Use Statute affirmed.

Day on Torts

The Court found that “the Commission could not warn [plaintiff] about a condition of which it did not have actual or constructive notice,” and therefore affirmed summary judgment based on the Recreational Use Statutes. internal citation omitted). This opinion was released 6.5 months after oral arguments in this case.

Statute 59
article thumbnail

Japanese Courts Admit the Operation of New Coal-Fired Power Plants in Kobe

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Japan ) Two weeks later, a civil complaint involving the same facts received a first-instance judgment rejecting the request for an injunction to block the construction and operation of coal-fired power plants. and requested an injunction to block the construction and subsequent operation of two coal-fired power plants.

Court 108
article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: The 2022 List of Litigation Horrors

JonathanTurley

Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Halloween has everything for a torts-filled holiday: battery, trespass, defamation, nuisance, product liability and more. However, my students and I often discuss the remarkably wide range of torts that comes with All Hallow’s Eve.

Tort 37