article thumbnail

Pair of immigration cases come to the court on key issue in some deportation proceedings

SCOTUSBlog

Congress extended the Immigration and Nationality Act, which regulates immigration into the United States, in 1988 to give immigration enforcement authorities, now the Department of Homeland Security, the power to automatically deport noncitizens convicted of an “aggravated felony” at the state or federal level.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court will answer teed-up bail questions and decide felony-murder resentencing issue; it depublishes arbitration opinion

At the Lectern

The cases concern resentencing a defendant whose felony-murder conviction is tossed under subsequent legislation narrowing the felony-murder rule. Specifically, the issue is whether a court, when resentencing for the felony underlying the vacated felony-murder conviction, can include an enhancement related to the underlying felony.

Felony 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Justices lean toward narrow reading of aggravated identity theft

SCOTUSBlog

United States felt like a legislation class in law school, with various canons of statutory construction being bandied about. Dubin concerns the reach of the federal aggravated identity theft statute and whether a person must steal another’s identity to commit the crime. Share In many ways, Monday’s oral argument in Dubin v.

Statute 76
article thumbnail

This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: March 26, 2022 to April 1, 2022

Broadcast Law Blog

For this action to be effective, the Senate would need to also vote on this bill to take the drug off Schedule I, which currently makes its possession and distribution (and the use of radio to promote it), a federal felony. Then the President would have to sign the bill. The permittee faces a $6,500 fine for these violations.

article thumbnail

What constitutes “identity theft”?

SCOTUSBlog

In recent years, the Supreme Court has expressed misgivings about white-collar prosecutions under broadly worded statutes. Judge Gregg Costa, joined by six other judges, wrote that “[t]he Supreme Court’s message is unmistakable: Courts should not assign federal criminal statutes a ‘breathtaking scope’ when a narrower reading is reasonable.”

Statute 123
article thumbnail

Yet another no-straight-grant conference

At the Lectern

In a partially published — and partially divided — opinion , the First District, Division Four, mostly affirmed a conviction for two counts of first degree murder and other felonies. The new legislation expands the category of defendants who are covered by the statute’s resentencing provisions. 775 (Stats.

Felony 49
article thumbnail

Justices wrestle with procedural issues stemming from their own federal criminal law decision

SCOTUSBlog

922(g) , the federal statute making it a crime for a convicted felon to possess a firearm, applies only to people who know they are “felons” within the meaning of that law. United States , but the justices are clearly concerned about the more general application of whatever lines they end up drawing. Roberts asked.