Constitutional Law Reporter
JUNE 1, 2023
According to the Court majority, when a prisoner pursues state post-conviction DNA testing through the state-provided litigation process, the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C. Facts of the Case A Texas jury found petitioner Rodney Reed guilty of the 1996 murder of Stacey Stites. Reed then sued in federal court under 42 U.S.C.
Constitutional Law Reporter
FEBRUARY 8, 2024
The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. Under Chevron , courts must defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency is charged with administering, even if they are inclined to rule another way. The cases before the Court, Relentless, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
DECEMBER 16, 2022
David Dubin was the managing partner of PARTS, a psychology practice in Texas. The post Supreme Court to Clarify What Constitutes Identity Theft appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. United States is whether identity theft occurs anytime a person uses someone else’s name in the commission of a crime.
Constitutional Law Reporter
DECEMBER 4, 2023
Rahimi, will decide whether a federal law banning the possession of guns by individuals who are subject to domestic violence restraining orders is constitutional. Facts of the Case Between December 2020 and January 2021, Zackey Rahimi was involved in five shootings in and around Arlington, Texas. In the light of N.Y.
Constitutional Law Reporter
APRIL 11, 2023
MoneyGram applied the common-law escheatment practices outlined in Texas v. Therefore, if the common law were to apply to the Disputed Instruments, then the abandoned proceeds would escheat inequitably solely to the State of incorporation, just like the money orders expressly referenced in the statute.”
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 27, 2022
Here is what Thomas says about Texas, a state whose robust gun laws, he reluctantly concedes, undeniably support New York’s approach to public safety. But the Texas statute, and the rationales set forth in English and Duke , are outliers.” Apparently, that claim continues to a be a promise as yet unfilled.
JonathanTurley
AUGUST 25, 2023
” Despite the growing anti-free speech movement in the United States, the Constitution still protects such protests, including the burning of the American flag. In Texas v. 397 (1989), the Supreme Court voted 5-4 that flag burning was protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content