Remove Constitutional Law Remove Criminal Law Remove Government Remove Laws
article thumbnail

Steve Bannon is held in criminal contempt of Congress, pushing key question over presidential power to the courts

LLRX

Selin Professor of Constitutional Democracy, reviews how this battle between the two branches of government over access to presidential information raises questions about the constitutional authority of Congress and how lawmakers acquire the information needed to hold the executive branch accountable in the U.S. Jennifer L.

article thumbnail

A Critique On The Territorial Jurisdiction Of Courts In India

LexForti

It would be imperative to take into cognizance the concept of jurisdiction which is a conglomeration of two terms, such as juris (meaning “law”) and diction (meaning “to speak”), which can be translated as presuming the appropriate forum that has the potential to “speak the law.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Policing Reimagined

LLRX

Developers, data scientists, and criminal justice experts working within the metaverse may be able to implement changes more efficiently than Congress as they are not subject to constitutional constraints.

article thumbnail

Policing Reimagined

LLRX

The thesis of Albert Chang's paper is the metaverse presents a unique opportunity for effective police reforms because software developers may be able to implement changes more efficiently than Congress as they are not subject to constitutional constraints.

article thumbnail

Was Rittenhouse’s Possession of the AR-15 Unlawful?

JonathanTurley

In covering the motions hearing last week in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, I noted a surprising comment from Judge Bruce Schroeder that he had “spent hours” with the Wisconsin gun law and could not state with certainty what it means in this case. Criminal laws are supposed to be interpreted narrowly.

Statute 56
article thumbnail

Sioux Tribe Imposes Language Criterion For Priority Vaccinations

JonathanTurley

However, the tribe is using the vaccine supplied by the federal government for free to protect those citizens deemed more valuable “assets.” Federal and state laws do apply on Indian reservations despite their status as self-regulating states.

article thumbnail

Chicago Faces 135% Increase In Carjackings. So Legislator Seeks To Ban “Grand Theft Auto”

JonathanTurley

The idea is that the government can regulate what you are enjoying and modify your desires and actions. It is the ultimate expression of paternalistic governance theory. It is not just limit to criminal impulses but extends to dietary impulses like the Big Gulp laws.