article thumbnail

“Audit records from Cyber Ninjas to be released following Arizona Supreme Court decision”

HowAppealing

“Audit records from Cyber Ninjas to be released following Arizona Supreme Court decision”: Ryan Randazzo of The Arizona Republic has this report.

article thumbnail

Death Penalty Faces Legal Tests in Arizona, Oklahoma

The Crime Report

The US Supreme Court will hear arguments from two Arizona death row inmates in a case that could have devastating consequences for prisoners attempting to prove their innocence before execution, reports The Guardian. Meanwhile, USA Today reports that a landmark Supreme Court decision last year in McGirt v.

Legal 105
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Sides With Arizona Death Row Inmate

Constitutional Law Reporter

Arizona , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court sided with John Montenegro Cruz, a death row inmate in Arizona. According to a 5-4 majority, Arizona erred in refusing to apply the Court’s precedent set forth in Simmons v. After Cruz’s conviction became final, the Supreme Court held in Lynch v.

Court 52
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court to hear Andy Warhol copyright case

JURIST

The US Supreme Court Monday issued an order list adding three new cases to its merits docket: National Pork Producers Council v. Arizona and Andy Warhol Foundation, Inc. ” The court granted review of only one issue in Cruz v. The Arizona Supreme Court denied Cruz’s petition under 32.1(g) Ross , Cruz v.

Court 104
article thumbnail

2023 is the Year of New Consumer Rights

Diane Drain

Arizona Bankruptcy Lawyer. Other consumer law changes will be enacted later in 2023 and will go into effect in 2023; this article lists changes whose effective dates have already been scheduled. – Diane L. Drain, P.A.,

article thumbnail

US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects environmental challenge to DACA

JURIST

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court decision on Monday rejecting an environmental challenge to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

article thumbnail

Divided court restricts prisoners’ ability to pursue claims that their lawyers were incompetent

SCOTUSBlog

The case pitted the language of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, which generally prohibits federal courts from holding an evidentiary hearing on these kinds of claims if the prisoner “has failed to develop the factual basis of a claim in State court proceedings,” against a 2012 Supreme Court decision, Martinez v.

Lawyer 109