Laws Litigating Litigation Stare Decisis 
Patently O
FEBRUARY 23, 2023
Stare decisis, Latin for “to stand by things decided,” is a legal principle that directs courts to adhere to previous judgments, i.e., precedent, when resolving a case with comparable facts. the Federal Circuit applied stare decisis to a prior validity ruling involving a different patent and a different accused infringer.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 23, 2021
Taking a different approach, Justice Clarence Thomas pointed out that the Patent Act does not mention claim preclusion or issue preclusion, but those doctrines nevertheless bar certain arguments in patent litigation. Wolf principally argued that stare decisis justifies maintaining the doctrine. Matthew Wolf argued for Hologic.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
MAY 14, 2022
Wade as “an infidelity,” Thomas dismissed the reliance on the principle of stare decisis , or the respect for precedent. Thomas told an audience that “I always say that when someone uses stare decisis that means they’re out of arguments. That was one of the central arguments in favor of preserving Roe.
Legal Research is Easy
AUGUST 5, 2019
Thing is, these days law and the decisions courts hand down are very much like that. The kicker is that unlike parents (who, hopefully, are on the same page and the kid realizes that it's unlikely dad will overrule mom), it is critical that courts make the same rulings over and over so that people know how law will be applied.
JURIST
JANUARY 8, 2024
However, the court has kept open whether other writ petitions filed as public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the remission orders are maintainable for future appropriate cases. Hence, Bano was not obligated to file a writ petition under Article 226 before the Gujarat State High Court.
JURIST
DECEMBER 6, 2022
Marisa Wright is a US National Correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard Law School. . Instead, it refers more broadly to any individual or body that possesses some part of the power to make laws within a state — what the Court referred to as the ‘legislative power.’” Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015).
Patently O
DECEMBER 11, 2022
Another important feature of collateral estoppel is that it applies to both issues of fact and law. Although some courts have disagreed on this point, precedent is only binding for questions of law. Uniloc has a litigation financing relationship with Fortress with the patents serving as collateral for the deal. Uniloc v. .”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
54 
Let's personalize your content