JURIST

JANUARY 5, 2024

The US Supreme Court on Friday temporarily reinstated Idaho’s abortion ban, which includes emergency abortions, and agreed to hear arguments on the matter. Section 18-622 of the Idaho Statutes criminalizes performing or attempting to perform an abortion, unless not doing so would result in the mother’s death.

Court 138

Court Statute Legal Legal 138

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 14, 2022

Environmental Protection Agency , the case of an Idaho couple who have been prohibited from building a home on land they own near Priest Lake, Idaho, because their lot contained wetlands that qualify as “navigable waters” regulated by the Clean Water Act. During the argument session that begins on Oct. Goertz (Oct.

Calendaring 91

Calendaring Statute Court Litigation 91

The Crime Report

APRIL 14, 2022

However, in 2007, the Court upheld, in District of Columbia v Heller , statutes limiting the possession of firearms from being carried in “sensitive places,” such as schools. He graduated summa cum laude from the University of Idaho with a B.A. Tyler Smotherman will graduate from Texas Law Tech in May 2023.

Felony 122

Felony Law School Laws Statute 122

HowAppealing

JANUARY 5, 2024

“Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Idaho’s Strict Abortion Ban; The court also temporarily reinstated the state law, which the Biden administration said conflicts with a federal statute on emergency-room care”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Statute 189

Statute Court Laws 189

The Crime Report

JUNE 29, 2021

In the most recent study, Idaho was singled out as relying almost entirely on penalties and fines to fund its judicial system, even as the state confronts more than $195 million in uncollected court debt. Mostly white and rural states like Idaho regularly impose substantial monetary sanctions on people without the means to pay them.”.

Court 138

Court Misdemeanor Laws Immigration 138

LawSites

MARCH 11, 2024

Yet when Malamud and his organization Public.Resource.Org , sought to publish the official statutes of the state of Georgia, the state sued him , accusing him in its court filing of engaging in “terrorism.” Arkansas, Idaho, Mississippi, New Mexico and Tennessee all do as well, according to Malamud. “If

Laws 94

Laws Legal Legal Legal Technology Solution 94

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

APRIL 18, 2023

Even if the decision stands, it applies only in the Ninth Circuit, which encompasses Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Air pollution is governed at the federal, state, and sometimes local levels, and the relevant federal statute is the U.S.

Construction 114

Construction Government Legal Legal 114

Broadcast Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2022

Broadcasters already upload this information to their public file, and this update merely brings the FCC’s rules in line with the requirements of federal statute and thus has no practical effect on a station’s political file obligations. We wrote in more detail about these changes, here. ( Federal Register ).

Construction 105

Construction Legal Legal Government 105

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 8, 2024

The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. A noncitizen who does not attend a removal proceeding can be ordered removed as long as written notice has been provided to him under the statute. Tori Madden) The question before the justices on Jan.

Government 86

Government Statute Court Cause of Action 86

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 15, 2020

These permitting decisions may then subject transmission lines to NEPA, among other statutes. . A recent complaint filed to block the B2H power line—which is proposed to run from Oregon to Idaho—alleged threats to visual resources and sage grouse habitat associated with tree-clearing. Three Recent Pipeline Setbacks. Last year the D.C.

Construction 55

Construction Litigation Litigating Court 55

JURIST

FEBRUARY 26, 2022

The Idaho House of Representatives passed a bill Thursday that would provide confidentiality to suppliers and manufacturers of lethal injection drugs. At a hearing on February 17, Idaho Department of Correction Director Josh Tewalt stated : “[T]he state does not have the material ability to carry out an execution.

Manufacturing 104

Manufacturing Statute Legal Legal 104

JURIST

APRIL 25, 2024

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in the case concerning whether a 1986 federal law preempts Idaho’s near-total abortion ban. The Idaho statute criminalizes performing or attempting to perform an abortion unless not doing so would result in the mother’s death.

Court 219

Court Court Rules Statute Laws 219

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 15, 2024

Share The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for Idaho to temporarily enforce a state law criminalizing gender-transition care for minors against anyone who is not part of a lawsuit currently challenging that ban. Moreover, the challengers stressed, the district court’s order only applies in Idaho.

Court 120

Court Laws Statute Legal 120

JURIST

AUGUST 3, 2022

.” Previously HHS issued a guidance warning pharmacies that refusing to fill prescriptions for abortifacients, among other medications, violated federal anti discrimination statutes. ” The president also spoke about the need for Congress to codify abortion protections into federal law.

Healthcare 245

Healthcare Court Decisions Statute Laws 245

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JANUARY 13, 2021

1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Idaho, filed Dec. 3:20-cv-01086 (W.D.

Court 52

Court Government Technology Assisted Review Litigation 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 30, 2020

Needless to say, this statute does not allow Virginia agencies to address routine business by meeting electronically for the next few weeks or months. Other states allow for remote participation in public meetings, but in formats that are simply impractical today.

Laws 52

Laws Government Statute Technology 52

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 24, 2024

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday was divided over whether a federal law requiring hospitals that participate in Medicare to provide “necessary stabilizing treatment” in an emergency overrides an Idaho law that bars most abortions. EMTALA, Kagan stressed, would require the hospital to perform an abortion, but Idaho would not permit it.

Court 145

Court Government Statute Laws 145

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 7, 2021

Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. First, the Supreme Court concluded that the statute requiring Commission approval of affiliated-interest agreement did not require environmental review. Idaho, filed Apr. Maui and Honolulu oppose the extension request.

Court 40

Court Government Construction Litigation 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 7, 2020

Thus, for example, the Secretary of the Interior has previously cancelled leases that were issued before the requirements of NEPA and other statutes were met. This has been interpreted as authorizing the cancellation of leases “issued in violation of. procedural requirements.” There is a catch, however.

Statute 102

Statute Court Legal Legal 102

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 7, 2017

The court also granted motions to strike the state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. The court concluded that the forest products company had not pleaded actual malice with the level of specificity required to sustain the state law claims. Resolute Forest Products, Inc.

Court 40

Court Attorney Technology Assisted Review Legal 40

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

Trinity Legal Center and Catholic Medical Association, National Association of Catholic Nurses-USA, Idaho Chooses Life and Texas Alliance for Life make similar arguments. To the contrary, in the year it was ratified (1868), thirty of thirty-seven states explicitly criminalized abortion by statute.” Against stare decisis.

Stare Decisis 136

Stare Decisis Court Laws Legal 136