Paralegal Mentor
MAY 15, 2014
Cooley Law School. We discuss the Innocence Project and the Post Conviction DNA Testing Statutes that opened the door for exoneration of the innocent around the country. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the Ohio Supreme Court, and trial and appellate courts in Ohio and Michigan.
JonathanTurley
APRIL 21, 2021
The shooting of Ma’Khia Bryant, 16, in Columbus, Ohio has sparked protests despite the police releasing a videotape that appeared to show Bryant moving to stab another girl. The Tennessee statute is unconstitutional insofar as it authorizes the use of deadly force against such fleeing suspects. Garner , 471 U.S. ” T ennessee v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 21, 2021
Opioid litigation has proceeded like a locomotive in part because of Judge Dan Aaron Polster, a federal jurist in Ohio who has been given control of some 2,000 federal cases from across the country under the multidistrict litigation system. The company and the Oklahoma justices are right on the law.
The Crime Report
MAY 16, 2023
Although these justifications are often framed as “common sense,” they ignore the fact that both civil and criminal laws already protect such places. The framing of the issue that [cisgender] women’s safety and trans rights are mutually exclusive advances a false narrative for two big reasons.
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 27, 2020
The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations. The cases from injuries last year are just now being filed under the statute of limitations, but it has been another bumper crop of Thanksgiving torts. 155 Ohio App. Twenty people reported feeling sick. 3d 553 (2003).
JonathanTurley
JUNE 17, 2022
The Court wrote that “[s] ince the statute does not specify the elements of “attempt to kill,” they are those required for an “attempt” at common law, … which include a specific intent to commit the unlawful act. ” . Indeed, such a claim would contradict controlling Supreme Court precedent.
JonathanTurley
APRIL 2, 2022
Judge Carter notes that Eastman still believes that the statute is unconstitutional as written. The court simply brushes that aside and states the “ignorance of the law is no excuse” and “believing the Electoral Count Act was unconstitutional did not give President Trump license to violate it.”.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
40 
Let's personalize your content