Day on Torts
DECEMBER 5, 2022
Where there was material evidence to show that plaintiff met her required due diligence, the jury verdict for plaintiff on her intentional misrepresentation and fraud claim was affirmed. First, the Court of Appeals found that defendant waived his argument that the evidence supporting fraud was not legally sufficient.
Day on Torts
MAY 18, 2022
Plaintiff asserted various claims against defendants, including breach of contract, fraud, intentional misrepresentation, and negligence, all of which the trial court dismissed as untimely pursuant to the three-year statute of limitations applicable to claims of injuries to real property. Code Ann. § 28-3-105.) internal citation omitted).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Day on Torts
FEBRUARY 3, 2022
Where the trial court did not provide sufficient reasoning in support of its dismissal of plaintiffs’ various HCLA and informed consent claims, summary judgment for defendants was vacated. Because the trial court did not give sufficient reasons for its decision, summary judgment was vacated on appeal. Gibson , No. Rule 56.04
Conflict of Laws
OCTOBER 25, 2023
But the measures so far have been piecemeal and were adopted mainly by the Supreme People’s Court (SPC). 22 of the proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive makes companies civilly liable for misconduct committed by their subsidiaries and business partners.
Day on Torts
NOVEMBER 7, 2022
The trial court agreed with defendant that the statute of limitations began to run August 24, 2020, the date patient was discharged, and that the pre-suit notice letter was therefore sent after the limitations period had expired. internal citation omitted). internal citations and quotation omitted).
Day on Torts
FEBRUARY 10, 2022
The trial court denied that motion and entered an award for the former employee on July 7, 2017. After this award was entered, County Attorney Robert Husker “began reviewing the court file and investigating the decisions made by [defendant attorney] during the trial.” On appeal, dismissal was affirmed. internal citation omitted).
The Cloud Court Blog
AUGUST 19, 2022
It’s no secret that some bad attorneys pursue their cases without diligence. Want to examine that data while controlling for variables such as matter types, courts, and judges? If you’re interested in mining data to obtain insights, feel free to drop me or someone at Cloud Court a note. What kind of data? The good news?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content