Remove Court Rules Remove Litigating Remove Litigation Remove Massachusetts
article thumbnail

Massachusetts court rules ExxonMobil cannot use anti-SLAPP law to dodge climate lawsuit

JURIST

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) Monday denied ExxonMobil Corp.’s The Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey released a statement following the SJC’s decision affirming the rejection of ExxonMobil’s “ anti-SLAPP ” motion to dismiss by the Suffolk Superior Court.

article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: The 2023 List of Litigation Horrors

JonathanTurley

The court ruled against her and found that the park’s duty was only to “make conditions as safe as they appear to be” and that Munoz “ was aware of the risk she encountered, and expected to be surprised, startled, and scared.” 1500 Massachusetts Avenue. particularly those with ravenous monkeys.

Tort 44
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Not Again! Two More Cases, Just this Week, of Hallucinated Citations in Court Filings Leading to Sanctions

LawSites

Yet it happened again this week — and it happened not once, but in two separate cases, one in Missouri and the other in Massachusetts. In fairness, the Missouri case involved a pro se litigant, not a lawyer, but that pro se litigant claimed to have gotten the citations from a lawyer he hired through the internet.

Court 144
article thumbnail

Lawsuit Says Woman was Kept in Hospice for Financial Gain

LegalReader

Massachusetts superior court rules woman's hospice claim can move forward.

article thumbnail

In a first for climate nuisance claims, a Hawai‘i State Court allowed Honolulu to proceed with its case against fossil fuel companies

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Citing Massachusetts v. EPA , the court stated that states have “a legitimate interest in combatting the adverse effects of climate change.” Second, the court found no “significant conflict” between any “concrete and specific” federal policy or interest and the application of Hawai‘i law.

Court 81
article thumbnail

First Amendment questions and California arbitration battles

SCOTUSBlog

Rollins challenges a Massachusetts law that makes it a felony to secretly record the speech of anyone other than a law enforcement officer, irrespective of motive. Next, we explore the bounds of the Federal Arbitration Act, with a pair of petitions arguing that California’s efforts to restrict arbitration agreements undermine federal law.

Felony 132
article thumbnail

In cases challenging affirmative action, court will confront wide-ranging arguments on history, diversity, and the role of race in America

SCOTUSBlog

Share In 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. Two years after that ruling, the Harvard case went to trial before a federal district judge in Massachusetts. The test that it outlines is so vague, SFFA argues, that the only way to determine whether a university can meet it is through litigation.

Court 115