Mondaq

JUNE 13, 2022

In this appeal, the Eighth Appellate District affirmed the trial court's decision, agreeing that Ohio's Uniform Trade Secret Act broadly preempts not only causes of action for misappropriation of trade secrets but also causes of.

Cause of Action 40

Cause of Action Court Decisions Court 40

Constitutional Law Reporter

AUGUST 28, 2023

According to the Court, such laws do not offend the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. Facts of the Case Robert Mallory worked for Norfolk Southern as a freight-car mechanic for nearly 20 years, first in Ohio, then in Virginia. After he left the company, Mallory moved to Pennsylvania for a period before returning to Virginia.

Court 52

Court Laws Cause of Action Constitutional Law 52

JonathanTurley

APRIL 30, 2021

Ohio (a 1969 case that we can discussed much in terms of “violent speech”), the Court struck down an Ohio law prohibiting public speech that was deemed as promoting illegal conduct. Ironically, the was a class discussion on free speech and racism. Swers was quoting Clarence Brandenburg from Brandenburg v.

Education 49

Education Court Decisions Court Constitutional Law 49

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 14, 2021

Ask any constitutional law student to name the most iconic Supreme Court decision, and they’ll probably answer Marbury v. Those two landmark rulings stand as the most celebrated decisions the court has ever issued. Ohio and Miranda v. This is the final round of the Big Dance, and it’s time to vote.

Court 107

Court Education Constitutional Law Court Decisions 107

Conflict of Laws

MAY 17, 2023

The state courts in Florida and Connecticut have become more likely to enforce in recent years. This means that the federal courts are free to adopt their own view of whether a clause is unreasonable or contrary to public policy without considering prior state court decisions. They apply federal common law.

Court 52

Court Statute Lawyer Lawyers 52

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 20, 2022

Some older Supreme Court decisions support that theory of consent. Some courts read [Supreme Court precedent] as effectively foreclosing [this consent-by-registration theory of jurisdiction], while others insist it remains viable.”.

Statute 105

Statute Stare Decisis Court Manufacturing 105

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 14, 2022

In a case that prompted satirical news outlet The Onion to file its first-ever amicus brief in the Supreme Court, an Ohio man sued police for violating his constitutional rights when they arrested him for creating a Facebook page parodying the local police department. City of Parma, Ohio. Novak was acquitted at trial.

Court 101

Court Real Estate Cause of Action Felony 101

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 27, 2022

It’s a little surprising the court let stand a federal court decision invalidating a state statute on constitutional grounds, but animal-rights groups defending that decision argued persuasively that state statutes are in a state of flux and it would be premature for the justices to take up the case now.

Statute 81

Statute Stare Decisis Court Drafting 81

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 22, 2022

Image from Supreme Court Petition. City of Pharm in which an Ohio man was prosecuted for posting a parody of his local police department. Now the Court has accepted a different parody case involving Jack Daniels where the company is suing the maker of dog chew toys. The case is Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc.

Court 38

Court Felony Court Decisions Constitutional Law 38

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 1, 2016

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision that vacated the listing of the Beringia distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific bearded seal subspecies as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Bird Groups Sent Notice of Violations in Connection with Ohio Wind Turbine Project.

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Attorney Court 40

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

Tracy Harpster, a deputy police chief from suburban Dayton, Ohio, was hunting for praise. Then 43, he had spent most of his career with the Moraine, Ohio, police department. In one case, Harpster listened to an Ohio mother’s desperate call for help and then wrote back, simply, “Call me. Harpster was rapt.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 20, 2023

The justices did not add any new cases to their merits docket for the 2023-24 term, but they did call for the views of the Biden administration in one case: Ohio v. There is no deadline for the Biden administration to file its brief.

Court Rules 96

Court Rules Court Lawyer Lawyers 96

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 13, 2022

This was a man who was born enslaved, became a renowned horseracing pioneer, made a fortune in the Gold Rush, brought American thoroughbreds to compete in England, and then emerged as the leading African American politician in the most politically important state, Ohio. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co.

Court 121

Court Education Government Legal 121

JonathanTurley

APRIL 19, 2021

Ohio , where the Supreme Court stressed that even “advocacy of the use of force or of law violation” is protected unless it is imminent. She added that there would be no acceptance of court decisions to the contrary: “We’re looking for a guilty verdict. Trump’s Jan. If we don’t, we cannot go away.”.

Criminal Law 60

Criminal Law Laws Law School Legal 60

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

APRIL 9, 2021

The court rejected CBD’s contention that DOI should undertake a specific search of Trump transition team records but directed DOI to clarify the extent to which its searches encompassed and identified correspondence between DOI and the transition team, or to expand its search to include such records. Center for Biological Diversity v.

Court 115

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 115

The Crime Report

NOVEMBER 19, 2021

Ohio was the biggest mistake made during the most liberal era in Supreme Court history, and why the concept of policing in a democracy has been struggling to regain its footing ever since. Is that a key to reinforcing the authority of Supreme Court decisions, or maybe will be in the future? CHEMERINSKY: Terry v.

Court 122

Court Stare Decisis Court Decisions Law School 122

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 2, 2021

Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who have already been told to preserve their phone records to be surrendered to the committee. The storm of secret subpoenas also seems to run against the thrust of recent Supreme Court decision, Trump v. With those words , House Select Committee Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) 6 riot in Congress.

Court 51

Court Court Decisions Constitutional Law Criminal Law 51

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 18, 2023

While I am a critic of Trump’s speech and actions on that day, I still believe that the the court is completely wrong on the First Amendment. We need to put this insidious legal theory to rest with the finality and clarity of a Supreme Court decision. In Brandenburg v. I hope that she does. Griswald

Court 59

Court Court Decisions Court Rules Legal 59