JURIST
FEBRUARY 9, 2024
Kirtz relied on the FCRA for his cause of action, which requires an investigation after receiving notice of a dispute over the completeness or accuracy of any information provided to a consumer reporting agency. Kirtz notified his credit reporting agency, Trans Union, of the incorrect reporting of his loan.
JURIST
DECEMBER 17, 2020
The court’s most in-depth criticism of the complaint was that it did not specify which public health order caused the injury: Sixth, the Amended Complaint fails to allege how injuries are fairly traceable to one or both Defendants as to specific Plaintiffs. Did you know that about 30 percent of charitable giving happens in December?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
AUGUST 28, 2023
After he left the company, Mallory moved to Pennsylvania for a period before returning to Virginia. Mallory filed his lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court. In fact, Norfolk Southern has registered to do business in Pennsylvania in light of its “regular, systematic, [and] extensive” operations there. Bauman , 571 U.S. 915 (2011).
Conflict of Laws
JUNE 28, 2023
Although he currently lives in Virginia, he sued Norfolk Southern (a company then incorporated and based in Virginia) in state court in Pennsylvania, asserting claims under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). The five Justices agreed that the Supreme Court has never overruled Pennsylvania Fire and that it thus controls this case.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 2, 2022
Issue : Whether a court may deny a plaintiff with an antitrust injury proximately caused by a defendant’s antitrust violation a Clayton Act cause of action based on a multifactor, prudential balancing test of “antitrust standing.”. Disclosure : Goldstein & Russell, P.C., O’Donnell & Sons, Inc. TitleMax of Delaware, Inc.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 27, 2021
It acknowledges a “shallow conflict” on whether federal law impliedly preempts such causes of action, but recommends the court not take the case. Pennsylvania , 20-7805 , is a capital case involving a defendant convicted based on his guilty plea of torturing and murdering an intellectually disabled woman.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
They asserted five causes of action: a claim under NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act; breaches of the 1851 Fort Laramie Treaty, the 1855 Lame Bull Treaty, the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty; and a failure to adhere to the Department of the Interior’s tribal consultation policies.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
245 
Let's personalize your content