article thumbnail

Supreme Court will decide which statute of limitations applies in malicious prosecution actions against attorneys

At the Lectern

Statute of limitations. Vannucci to decide which statute of limitations applies in a malicious prosecution action against an attorney who sued the plaintiff, the one-year period of Code of Civil Procedure section 340.6 The court granted a pro per’s petition for review in Escamilla v.

Statute 45
article thumbnail

Nevada Supreme Court upholds state ban on ghost guns, reversing lower-court decision

JURIST

” Additionally, Stiglich found that the statute does not pose a risk of arbitrary enforcement by the government. Stiglich found that the statute is a general intent statute, meaning that a person has a guilty state of mind to be convicted of a criminal offense if they intend to perform a specific act that led to the crime.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

U.S. Steps Up Accountability For Companies That Defraud the Government

The Crime Report

The push follows a significant uptick in the number of active FCA investigations, the level of resources the government is putting into them, the number of agents that are working them, and the level of teamwork and coordination between US attorneys and Main Justice. In fiscal 2021, DOJ obtained $5.6

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court considers case concerning bankruptcy code, sovereign immunity of Native American tribes

JURIST

The court will consider the question of whether Congress intended to allow people to sue Native American tribes in bankruptcy disputes and will then determine whether the waiver of immunity under the Bankruptcy Reform Act for foreign or domestic government extends to these Native American tribes.

Statute 218
article thumbnail

Federal appeals court affirms conviction of Trump ex-advisor for contempt of Jan. 6 congressional committee

JURIST

192 , the contempt-of-Congress statute, by defining it to mean “deliberately” and “intentionally” without including “in good-faith.” ” He argued that he did not “willfully” refuse to answer the subpoena because he acted in good faith based on his attorney’s counsel. .”

Court 193
article thumbnail

“Government employees are not available to accept private clients”

Patently O

Correll is also a patent attorney and during that time Correll ran his own small firm. Government employees are not available to accept private clients or to represent clients other than their agency before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.” Why is this a problem — at least according to the USPTO “ U.S.

article thumbnail

Government immunity limited

At the Lectern

County of Riverside today holds a broad government immunity statute isn’t as broad as many Courts of Appeal have been construing it. Government Code section 821.6 Government Code section 821.6 Menetrez, a former Horvitz & Levy attorney, wrote the article before becoming a judge.