Remove agencies north-dakota-supreme-court
article thumbnail

North Dakota truck stop objects to federal allowance for debit-card processing fees

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. The Administrative Procedure Act is a federal law that governs the procedures by which federal agencies propose and issue regulations. A federal district court in North Dakota dismissed the lawsuit, and the U.S.

Statute 93
article thumbnail

Twelve cases added to Supreme Court calendar

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Friday issued orders from its so-called “long conference” – the justices’ private conference in the last week of September, at which they met for the first time since the end of June to add new cases to their docket. The trial court rejected that argument, and the California Court of Appeals agreed.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Pipeline Decisions Do Not Spell Doom for Transmission

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Additionally, both types of pipelines need approval from a number of federal agencies depending on their routes and potential impacts. Forest Service, or other agency with jurisdiction over the land. Three pipelines have recently suffered legal blows: the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Keystone XL, and the Dakota Access Pipeline.

article thumbnail

The Predictability of the Mayo/Alice Framework – A New Empirical Perspective

Patently O

Professor Datzov is an Assistant Professor at the University of North Dakota School of Law. The Mayo/Alice framework used to determine patent eligibility has been a lightning rod for criticism since the Supreme Court’s decisions a decade ago. By Jason Rantanen and Nikola Datzov. affirmance rate.

article thumbnail

Forum Selection Clauses, Afghanistan, and the United States

Conflict of Laws

One Afghanistan-based company sues another in commercial court in Afghanistan. The Afghanistan Supreme Court reverses. It offers insights into best drafting practices for choice-of-court clauses. courts decide whether these clauses should be enforced. They were not courts of the United States as a whole.

article thumbnail

Climate Litigation Chart Updates – November 2016

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision that vacated the listing of the Beringia distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific bearded seal subspecies as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). West Virginia Federal Court Ordered EPA to Evaluate Clean Air Act’s Impacts on Coal Industry.

article thumbnail

July 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lacked authority to administratively stay portions of new source performance standards for the oil and gas sector for which it had granted requests for reconsideration. The court therefore found that the stay was unauthorized and vacated it.

Court 40