article thumbnail

Federal Judge Enjoins Tennessee Law Limiting Drag Shows

JonathanTurley

The vagueness problems could be reduced by limiting the scope to adult entertainment settings. Section 2 of the Statute makes it “an offense for a person to perform adult cabaret entertainment,” either “(A) On public property; or (B) in a location where the adult cabaret entertainment could be viewed by a person who is not an adult.”

article thumbnail

Case preview: Justices to consider procedural issue in major climate-change lawsuit

SCOTUSBlog

One ground was a law known as the “ federal officer removal statute ,” which allows the removal to federal court of lawsuits filed in state court against “any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, in an official or individual capacity, for or relating to any act under color of such office.”

Statute 134
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A fight over public records in Puerto Rico hinges on financial board’s claim of sovereign immunity

SCOTUSBlog

Centro sued the board in the federal court because of provisions of PROMESA that channel almost all forms of litigation against the board to federal (rather than local) courts. Apparently all agree that Puerto Rican law would recognize such a suit against Puerto Rico itself in the Puerto Rican courts.

Statute 98
article thumbnail

In back-to-back cases, justices will scrutinize traditional limits on challenges to agency proceedings

SCOTUSBlog

Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The general federal jurisdiction statute ( 28 U.S.C. Share Monday’s arguments in Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission v.

Statute 110
article thumbnail

New York sues New Jersey over compact governing Port of New York and New Jersey

SCOTUSBlog

To create the compact, each state passed statutes and, as New York’s bill of complaint indicates is a constitutional requirement for interstate compacts, Congress consented as well. However, in 2018, New Jersey passed a statute to withdraw from the compact, and on Dec. Texas Entertainment Association, Inc. However, the U.S.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Rules Quiet Title Act’s Time Bar Is Claim-Processing Rule

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court held that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a claim-processing rule rather than a bright-line rule that constrains a court’s jurisdiction. In Wilkins v. United States , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote on behalf of the Court. Fort Bend County v.

article thumbnail

The late-May calendar is another 9-case blockbuster

At the Lectern

In March of this year, the court heard argument in another COVID insurance case, Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. California Commerce Club : Does California’s test for determining whether a party has waived its right to compel arbitration by engaging in litigation remain valid after the United States Supreme Court decision in Morgan v.