Remove Court Remove Litigating Remove Mississippi Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Minnesota Supreme Court upholds felony disenfranchisement law

JURIST

The Minnesota Supreme Court Wednesday upheld a state law prohibiting convicted felons from voting while on probation or parole in a 3-1 ruling. The court rejected this argument. Justice Thissen’s opinion also held that the statute did not create the racially disparate impact of felony disenfranchisement.

Felony 194
article thumbnail

Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades

SCOTUSBlog

Share When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would vote to end the constitutional right to an abortion. If the court were to overturn Roe and Casey , access to abortion in America would shrink dramatically and immediately. Katie Barlow).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Abortion providers ask court to block Texas ban on abortions beginning at six weeks of pregnancy

SCOTUSBlog

Share A Texas law that bans abortions anytime a fetal heartbeat is detected will “immediately and catastrophically reduce abortion access in Texas” if it is allowed to take effect on Wednesday, a group of abortion providers told the Supreme Court on Monday. The Mississippi case, Dobbs v. 1 effective date.

Court 119
article thumbnail

Supreme Court set to hear arguments in two challenges to Texas law that bans most abortions

SCOTUSBlog

Share Two months ago, Texas put in place the most restrictive abortion law since the Supreme Court decided Roe v. The answer to that question may come in a separate abortion case , involving Mississippi, scheduled for argument on Dec. Wade in 1973. Nevertheless, the two Texas cases — Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson and United States v.

Laws 125
article thumbnail

Court seems inclined to let abortion providers pursue their challenge to Texas law

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in two challenges to S.B. But Monday’s argument focused primarily on the law’s unusual enforcement mechanism, which distinguishes it from similar abortion bans that have been enacted by other states (and that have been consistently struck down by federal courts). 1 at 5:45 p.m.

Laws 119
article thumbnail

“Supreme Court Allows Challenge to Texas Abortion Law but Leaves It in Effect; The law, which bans most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, was drafted to evade review in federal court and has been in effect since September”

HowAppealing

“Supreme Court Allows Challenge to Texas Abortion Law but Leaves It in Effect; The law, which bans most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, was drafted to evade review in federal court and has been in effect since September”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. ” David G. ” David G. .”

Drafting 100
article thumbnail

Two cases alleging disability-based discrimination

SCOTUSBlog

Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, the viability of certain types of disability-based claims under three federal statutes. courts of appeals are “nearly evenly divided” on this issue, the county asks for the justices’ review. Mississippi. Exby-Stolley.

Statute 83