Remove Court Remove Indiana Remove Litigating Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Federal appeals court allows Indiana abortion restrictions to take effect

JURIST

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion on Wednesday setting aside the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana’s ruling that several Indiana abortion restrictions from Indiana Code Section 16-34-2-1 were unconstitutional.

Court 197
article thumbnail

Court explores continued private enforcement of spending clause enactments

SCOTUSBlog

Talevski did not reveal a Supreme Court ready to reconsider or overrule a line of cases allowing private suits for damages in federal court under 42 U.S.C. Robbins centered the fundamental error in the court’s precedent allowing individuals to enforce spending clause enactments through Section 1983. of Marion County v.

Court 90
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Hears Challenge to EPA’s Good Neighbor Rule

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases last week. While the case centers on the EPA’s regulation of interstate air pollution under the Clean Air Act, the issues before the Court are largely procedural. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the motions to stay and the States appealed to the Supreme Court.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Update on the 340B Contract Pharmacy Showdown: Judge Rules HRSA threat of enforcement is consistent with the 340B statute and the Constitution, but is arbitrary and capricious under the APA

FDA Law Blog

Kirschenbaum — On September 30, we blogged about the ongoing dispute and litigation around the use of contract pharmacies under the 340B Drug Discount Program (click here ). District Court for the Southern District of Indiana decided several substantive motions in Eli Lilly & Co. By Faraz Siddiqui & Alan M.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Exclusive: You keep using that word; I don’t think you know what it means.

Patently O

The pending Supreme Court case of Warsaw v. There are two different statutes regarding Federal Court exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases. 1338(a) provides Federal district courts with “original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents.” by Dennis Crouch.

article thumbnail

Justices Consider Making It Easier to Challenge Regulatory Power of Federal Agencies

Constitutional Law Reporter

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in five cases last week. Two of the cases involve whether litigants must wait for administrative proceedings to conclude before challenging the authority of federal agencies in federal court. Below is a brief summary of the cases before the Court: Securities and Exchange Commission v.

article thumbnail

Extraterritoriality and International Law Conference and Webinar, September 15-17, 2021

Conflict of Laws

Indiana University Maurer School of Law. Rudy Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law. Omri Sender , Advisor and Litigator in Public International Law. Moderator: Hannah Buxbaum , Vice President for International Affairs, Indiana University; John E. Extraterritoriality in Statutes and Regulations.

Laws 40