SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 24, 2023

Share Federal immigration law requires the deportation of noncitizens who are convicted of an aggravated felony, which includes offenses “relating to obstruction of justice.” By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in Pugin v. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit held in Pugin’s case that it did not.

Felony 100

Felony Statute Immigration Court 100

Attorney at Work

MAY 31, 2022

Managing an increasing volume of cases and court deadlines– sometimes in multiple jurisdictions – is one of the biggest time management challenges for law firms. . A Chicago immigration lawyer moved for an emergency stay of removal for a client after an asylum application was denied.

Calendaring 108

Calendaring Court Lawyer Lawyers 108

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 21, 2021

There is now an important ruling out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit that could have enormous implications not just for the media but anyone who retweets stories or claims. The appellate panel ruled unanimously for Rep. Sullivan , which a lower court could not set aside.

Tort 52

Tort Immigration Cause of Action Court Rules 52

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2021

1326 , they must prove the existence of a prior removal order adjudicated by a federal immigration agency. Refugio Palomar-Santiago’s case illustrates two broader themes: first, the various interactions between the civil immigration and criminal legal systems, and second, the ongoing complexity of the immigration laws.

Immigration 98

Immigration Felony Statute Court 98

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 18, 2020

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that it was too early to resolve the legality of the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people who are in the country illegally from the state-by-state breakdown used to allocate seats in the House of Representatives. Background. Second, the president must send a report to Congress by Jan.

Immigration 107

Immigration Court Government Legal 107

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2021

Share The Supreme Court on Monday declined to immediately resolve an attempt by 14 states to revive litigation over a controversial Trump-era immigration rule after the Biden administration declined to defend it in court. Under federal law, people who are not U.S. The justices agreed in February to do so.

Litigation 97

Litigation Litigating Immigration Government 97

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 19, 2022

Share Nineteen states came to the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices to keep in place a Trump-era policy that allows immigration officials to quickly expel migrants seeking asylum at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The dispute now before the Supreme Court is a separate case. immigration court.

Court 129

Court Immigration Government Litigation 129

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 11, 2023

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. Because it appears that sitting is mostly empty at the moment, this conference will be a critical one for filling up the court’s calendar. Five years later, the court held in Trans World Airlines v.

Government 85

Government Court Legal Legal 85

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. It demands to be governed by as universal a rule of apportioning responsibility as is available.” and non-U.S. FEATURED CASE.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Spokane County District Court , No. and non-U.S. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 148.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

JURIST

JUNE 15, 2022

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a case in which Republican-led states were attempting to defend a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. In a brief order, the court dismissed Arizona v.

Immigration 104

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 104

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 26, 2022

Supreme Court. With Justice Stephen Breyer expected to retire at the end of this term , California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger is one of the frontrunners to succeed him. Her mother hails from Jamaica, while her late father was the son of Jewish immigrants from eastern Europe. Early life and career.

Court 113

Court Laws Lawyer Lawyers 113

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2020

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. and non-U.S. If you know of any cases we have missed, please email us at columbiaclimate@gmail.com.

Court Reporting 40

Court Reporting Court Government Construction 40

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 4, 2023

There is a major ruling out of the United States States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in favor of a middle school science teacher, Eric Dodge, who was barred from wearing a “Make America Great Again” baseball cap and later berated by the principal, Caroline Garrett, as a “racist” and a “homophobe.” Lane, 573 U.S.

Human Resources 52

Human Resources Court Rules Immigration Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 6, 2023

Allowing the emergency declarations to expire will unravel an array of federal policies on issues like free at-home tests, temporary Medicaid coverage, and even immigration. The plan is on hold as a result of lower-court rulings, and in a pair of cases being argued at the Supreme Court on Feb.

Immigration 108

Immigration Legal Legal Court 108

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 21, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. The justices will hear the case in late November without waiting for a federal appeals court to weigh in.

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 145

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 15, 2021

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas delivered a blow to the Biden Administration on Friday by ordering the reinstatement of the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program, also known as the “Remain-in-Mexico” policy. ” That should sound familiar.

Court 83

Court Immigration Court Rules Litigation 83

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 18, 2022

Share For the third time this term, the Supreme Court will weigh in on whether someone can stage an intervention – the legal kind, that is. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit struck down an earlier version of the law. On Monday, in Berger v. It was the legislature’s second effort in five years to impose an ID requirement for voting.

Litigation 94

Litigation Litigating Attorney Court 94

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 27, 2021

The Biden Administration has racked up a long line of losses in federal courts in what is one of the worst records in the first six months of any modern presidency. This week the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to strike down President Biden’s renewal of the controversial eviction moratorium.

Court 53

Court Legal Legal Court Rules 53

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 3, 2022

Share The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that Kentucky’s attorney general should have been allowed to intervene to defend a state law restricting abortion after another state official declined to do so – even when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit had already struck down the law. The 8-1 decision in Cameron v.

Attorney 98

Attorney Legal Legal Laws 98

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. immigration court. immigration court.

Immigration 97

Immigration Legal Legal Government 97

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.

Immigration 93

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 93

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 23, 2022

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that two Republican legislators in North Carolina can join a lawsuit to defend the constitutionality of the state’s voter-identification law. In an 8-1 opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the Supreme Court ruled that the Republican legislators have a right to intervene in the lawsuit.

Laws 140

Laws Court Attorney Litigation 140