SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 1, 2021
Switzer , the Supreme Court ruled that state prisoners could pursue post-conviction claims for DNA testing of crime-scene evidence in a federal civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Issue : Whether the Supreme Court’s rejection in Rodriguez v. In Skinner v. 1983 if they have unsuccessfully sought testing under state procedures.
Parasec
APRIL 4, 2024
Federal: Federal Court Rules CTA Unconstitutional On March 1, 2024, a federal court in Alabama ruled in National Small Business United (NSBU) v. For more on DAOs in Wyoming, visit the Secretary of State’s FAQ page on the topic. To learn more about HB 318, please go here.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. The appellate court also found that even if the trial court erred, the error was harmless because the State proved both acts beyond a reasonable doubt.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 24, 2022
The two doctors at the center of the Supreme Court case (who are currently serving sentences of more than 20 years) are both awaiting lower-court rulings on whether they are now entitled to new trials themselves. The post The <em>other</em> Supreme Court ruling with big repercussions for U.S.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 6, 2018
California Federal Court Barred BLM from Enforcing Delay of Oil and Natural Gas Waste Prevention Rule; States, Trade Groups Asked Wyoming Court to Expedite Review of Rule and Suspend Deadlines. 22, 2018); Wyoming v. Trump , No. 1:17 -cv-00253 (D.D.C. California v. Bureau of Land Management , No.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 8, 2021
The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district court rulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.
JURIST
APRIL 5, 2023
The plaintiffs are a group of Republican-led states, including Louisiana, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Dakota, Texas, West Virginia and Wyoming. the court concluded that the states did not have standing to challenge the order because their injuries flow from “potential future regulations.”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
94 
Let's personalize your content