HowAppealing

JUNE 14, 2022

“Supreme Court Rejects Bail Hearings for Jailed Immigrants; A federal law, the justices ruled, does not require immigration judges to consider whether immigrants may be released while their challenges are pending”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Immigration 100

Immigration Court Rules Court Laws 100

JURIST

SEPTEMBER 14, 2021

The US Department of Justice filed an appeal on Friday with the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit challenging a lower court ruling in July blocking new applications to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Court Rules 197

Court Rules Court Immigration Government 197

JURIST

JULY 28, 2023

The UK High Court ruled on Thursday that Secretary of State for the Home Department Suella Braverman must not exercise her new powers to restrict protection and support of victims of modern slavery without first considering the risks of re-trafficking.

Government 196

Government Court Immigration Court Rules 196

JURIST

JANUARY 16, 2024

The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) has deemed the transfer of asylum seekers under the UK’s new Rwanda arrangement violates international law in a legal analysis published on Monday. In response to the bill, the Rwandan government threatened to withdraw from the treaty if the UK did not adhere to international law.

Laws 197

Laws Immigration Government Legal 197

JURIST

APRIL 26, 2024

King Charles III has given his assent to the UK government’s legislation which will allow asylum seekers to be sent to Rwanda. The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill 2024 received Royal Assent on Thursday and will now become law in the UK.

Laws 118

Laws Immigration Government Court Rules 118

JURIST

JANUARY 23, 2024

The UK Government’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda suffered a setback Monday, when the House of Lords voted to require the government to substantiate its claims that Rwanda is a safe country before ratifying the new treaty between the UK and the African nation.

Government 104

Government Immigration Court Rules Legal 104

JURIST

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

The European Commission voted Friday to refer Hungary to the Court of Justice of the European Union, alleging that Hungary failed to comply with a 2020 Court of Justice judgment ordering reform of Hungary’s exclusionary asylum laws.

Laws 204

Laws Immigration Court Court Rules 204

JURIST

AUGUST 1, 2022

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled Monday that two vessels owned by non-profit Sea Watch may have been wrongly detained by the Italian government. Sea Watch then appealed the detention in Italian court. Sea Watch rescues migrants attempting to cross the Mediterranean Sea in vessels that are not seaworthy.

Court Rules 196

Court Rules Court Government Legal 196

JURIST

JUNE 7, 2021

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday on an immigrant status case regarding noncitizens seeking to change their immigration status from temporary protected status (TPS) to lawful permanent residency. This case involves Jose Sanchez and Sonia Gonzalez, who entered the US illegally in the 1990s.

Immigration 188

Immigration Court Court Rules Statute 188

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 9, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon agreed to hear four new cases, including a First Amendment challenge to a federal law that prohibits encouraging illegal immigration. Three years ago, the court agreed to take up this question in another case, United States v. Instead, a unanimous court ruled that the U.S.

Immigration 90

Immigration Statute Court Court Rules 90

JURIST

MARCH 29, 2024

The UN Committee on Human Rights called on the UK on Thursday to withdraw the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill and certain provisions of the Illegal Migration Act 2023 due to human rights concerns. It urged the UK to withdraw or repeal the bill if it became law. ” Its approach has received widespread criticism.

Immigration 244

Immigration Court Rules Laws Government 244

JURIST

APRIL 22, 2024

The UK’s Parliament on Tuesday approved the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill , which would declare Rwanda a “safe country” in order to send certain asylum seekers there while they await their applications to be assessed. The court ruled in November 2023, that Rwanda could not be considered a safe country.

Court 104

Court Immigration Government Court Rules 104

JURIST

JANUARY 18, 2024

The UK government Wednesday published letters regarding how civil servants should follow the Safety of Rwanda Bill. The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill was introduced by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s government in response to a UK Supreme Court ruling in November.

Immigration 118

Immigration Government Court Rules Court 118

JURIST

DECEMBER 17, 2021

The Supreme Court of Canada announced Thursday they would hear the appeal of a lower court ruling that re-implemented Canada’s Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) with the United States. The STCA was signed between the US and Canadian governments in 2002.

Court 197

Court Immigration Court Rules Government 197

JURIST

NOVEMBER 15, 2023

The UK Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the government’s Rwanda plan is unlawful. The Rwanda plan was an immigration policy used by the UK government to “stop the boats” of migrants arriving in the UK. We are determined to protect our borders. And we are determined to stop the boats.

Court 104

Court Immigration Court Rules Legal 104

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 7, 2021

Share The Supreme Court unanimously ruled on Monday that noncitizens who have been granted temporary humanitarian relief from deportation cannot use the process known as “adjustment of status” to obtain lawful permanent residency in the United States without leaving the country. The court ruled in Sanchez v.

Immigration 142

Immigration Government Statute Court Rules 142

JURIST

OCTOBER 4, 2022

The court is asked to consider whether an unnamed law firm specializing in international tax was allowed to withhold documents in a grand jury proceeding on the basis of attorney-client privilege. Garland the court is again asked to examine administrative procedure, this time in the context of an immigration proceeding.

Court 118

Court Immigration Tort Law Firm 118

JURIST

JUNE 24, 2023

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview.

Immigration 211

Immigration Court Rules Court Statute 211

JURIST

JULY 1, 2023

Indian law students are reporting for JURIST on law-related developments in and affecting India. This dispatch is from Soumyabrata Chakraborty, a second-year law student at Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat. The situation in the state has been tense ever since violence broke out on May 03, 2023.

Government 104

Government Court Rules Court Immigration 104

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 29, 2024

Monday’s grants involve (among others) the interpretation of federal racketeering laws and the “benefit of the doubt” rule for veterans. The district court ruled for Medical Marijuana and the other companies on Horn’s RICO claim. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, which reinstated his RICO claim.

Personal Injury 104

Personal Injury Court Immigration Government 104

HowAppealing

MARCH 27, 2024

“Appeals Court Keeps Block on Texas Migrant Arrest Law; The decision in favor of the federal government left in place a trial court injunction while courts determine whether the measure is legal”: J. appeals court keeps block on Texas immigration law.”

Immigration 100

Immigration Government Court Legal 100

The Crime Report

JANUARY 6, 2023

People walk dangerous routes when the government eliminates or fails to provide legal avenues that are safe, permanent and predictable whether it’s across the street or across an international border. The problems with the absence of permanent and lawful paths to entry have been decades in the making. Controlling Movement.

Immigration 114

Immigration Laws Misdemeanor Government 114

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 29, 2021

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, adopting a rigid interpretation of a federal statute that requires the government to serve a “notice to appear” in order to trigger the “stop-time” rule. That rule can foreclose access to immigration relief by preventing noncitizens from accruing the time required for eligibility.

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Rules Government Laws 145

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 5, 2021

Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents , the Supreme Court ruled that a private individual could sue an FBI agent for violating his Fourth Amendment rights, even when there was not a specific law authorizing a claim for damages. The district court ruled that Boule’s claims would impermissibly extend Bivens , but the U.S.

Immigration 82

Immigration Court Rules Court Government 82

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 17, 2021

Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether the prosecution in a case of illegal gun possession by a person with a nonimmigrant visa must prove he knew of his legal status, and the inquiry courts should follow in deciding to close the courtroom to the public.

Statute 87

Statute Government Court Immigration 87

Constitutional Law Reporter

JULY 12, 2023

Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. According to the eight-member majority, “federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions.”

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Rules Court Entertainment 52

JURIST

JULY 17, 2021

District Court Judge Andrew Hanan agreed with the Texas-led coalition, finding that the creation of the program had violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by not using notice and comment rulemaking in order to adopt DACA in the first place.

Court Rules 239

Court Rules Court Legal Legal 239

JURIST

JANUARY 26, 2024

. “ The Executive Branch of the United States has a constitutional duty to enforce federal laws protecting States, including immigration laws on the books right now ,” Governor Abbott’s statement reads.

Immigration 245

Immigration Felony Statute Court Rules 245

JURIST

APRIL 21, 2021

These cases will determine which Alaskan native groups are eligible to receive COVID-19 relief funds and will impact tens of thousands of immigrants living and working in the US under a Temporary Protected Status (TPS). They urged the court to defer to DHS’ interpretation of the statute.

Immigration 211

Immigration Court Statute Court Rules 211

The Crime Report

JULY 13, 2021

Garland, which found that the federal government must provide all required information to immigrants facing deportation in a single notice, could potentially benefit scores of immigrants hoping to get their deportation cancelled because they didn’t receive proper notice of the court proceedings, reports the Associated Press.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Immigration Court Government 52

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 24, 2023

Share Federal immigration law requires the deportation of noncitizens who are convicted of an aggravated felony, which includes offenses “relating to obstruction of justice.” By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in Pugin v. Such “redundancies are common in statutory drafting,” Kavanaugh wrote.

Felony 101

Felony Statute Immigration Court 101

The Crime Report

APRIL 30, 2021

The Supreme Court opened a door Thursday that could let thousands of noncitizens avoid deportation, ruling 6-3 that federal agencies failed to properly notify individuals about the time and place of removal proceedings, reports The Wall Street Journal.

Immigration 98

Immigration Court Court Rules Government 98

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 6, 2022

Circuit Judges James Ho and Kurt Engelhardt), Chief Judge Priscilla Richman found that President Obama did indeed circumvent Congress and evaded the limits imposed in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) when it enacted DACA in 2012. The court declared: “Under the first factor, DACA’s deficiencies are severe.

Court Rules 45

Court Rules Court Immigration Government 45

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 31, 2023

To enforce these laws, Congress created the SEC. It granted the agency the power to regulate investors through either lawsuits in federal court or internal hearings in front of an administrative law judge, or ALJ. Under federal law, investors may challenge only final internal decisions by the SEC in the courts of appeals.

Immigration 97

Immigration Administrative Law Government Court 97

Conflict of Laws

AUGUST 28, 2023

Liberal societies may be tempted to open up access to same-sex marriage to all, especially when their citizens are involved and regardless of whether the same-sex marriage is permitted under the personal law of the other foreign party. Oppong, Private International Law in Nigeria (Hart Publishing, 2020) pp. 182 ), Richard F.

Contract 57

Contract Immigration Divorce Laws 57

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 1, 2022

By lifting up the symbolic political power of women, the court has now left it to those who are marginalized politically, economically, and otherwise to fight with limited resources within a social system that is designed to overlook, marginalize, control their bodies and their labor.

Legal 100

Legal Legal Immigration Court 100

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2021

1326 , they must prove the existence of a prior removal order adjudicated by a federal immigration agency. Refugio Palomar-Santiago’s case illustrates two broader themes: first, the various interactions between the civil immigration and criminal legal systems, and second, the ongoing complexity of the immigration laws.

Immigration 98

Immigration Felony Statute Court 98