JURIST
APRIL 19, 2023
The US Supreme Court Tuesday held that New Jersey may unilaterally withdraw from the Waterfront Commission Compact, an interstate compact between the two states created to fight crime in the Port of New York and New Jersey. In the case New York v.
Law 360
APRIL 4, 2023
A New Jersey and Pennsylvania bistate commission handling a Delaware River bridge project went beyond its powers when it mandated that contractors make project labor agreements with specific unions in order to bid on the construction contract, a Garden State appeals court ruled Tuesday.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 6, 2017
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a West Virginia federal district court had erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to consider the coal company Murray Energy Corporation’s and its affiliates’ lawsuit that sought to compel EPA to conduct evaluations of the Clean Air Act’s employment effects. Thorson , No.
Patently O
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
That’s because current disclosure of litigation funding relies on a patchwork of state law, court rules, self-reporting, FOIA requests, leaks to journalists, and funding pitches. 604C (2021); Nonrecourse Civil Litigation Advance Contracts, Ohio Rev. 12; Nonrecourse Civil Litigation Act, Neb.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 31, 2021
For more than 50 years,” the ACLU of New Jersey wrote in a tribute , “Frank Askin devoted everything within him to the principles of liberty, equality, fairness, and personal freedom.”. It was the first time the court recognized that gender stereotyping qualifies as unlawful sex discrimination. 4, 2021).
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
SEPTEMBER 10, 2021
New Jersey Federal Court Remanded Hoboken’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Companies to State Court. On September 8, 2021, a federal district court in New Jersey granted the City of Hoboken’s motion to remand to state court its climate change lawsuit against oil and gas companies. —in
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 6, 2018
The federal district court for the Eastern District of California held that more analysis of the impacts climate change would have on a water transfer program for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta was required under NEPA. Jacobson’s lawsuit asserted defamation, breach of contract, and promissory estoppel claims. Future Generations v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content