article thumbnail

Court endorses private Section 1983 enforcement of spending clause enactments

SCOTUSBlog

FNHRA, a law enacted under Congress’s spending clause powers, requires nursing facilities participating in Medicare and Medicaid to “protect and promote the rights of each resident” as a condition of receiving funds. The sine qua non is incompatibility between Section 1983 enforcement and any enforcement scheme in the statute.

Statute 99
article thumbnail

SCOTUS bars emotional distress damages under the Affordable Care Act

JURIST

This decision clarifies what damages are available to individuals who sue under federal anti-discrimination statutes. Cummings then filed a lawsuit against Premier for discrimination on the basis of her disability, alleging that the company violated federal anti-discrimination laws when refusing to provide her with an interpreter.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Court rules against plaintiff seeking emotional distress damages for discrimination

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled 6-3 against a plaintiff seeking emotional distress damages for alleged violations of certain federal anti-discrimination laws. Premier Rehab Keller PLLC , the court applied the contract-law inquiry to hold that Cummings could not recover damages for emotional distress.

article thumbnail

The Critical Role of Lawyers and Bar Associations in Achieving Net Zero

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Lawyers, bar associations, and law societies have an important but not fully recognized role to play in achieving the net zero goal in the Paris Agreement. Climate Change as an Increasingly Common Feature of Law Practice Climate change is no longer an issue of concern only to environmental and energy lawyers. John Kerry, then U.S.

Lawyer 111
article thumbnail

Justices mull availability of emotional distress damages in anti-discrimination cases

SCOTUSBlog

Though some justices seemed receptive to the availability of emotional distress damages, questions from the bench also suggested concern about the size of emotional distress awards and the absence of explicitly defined remedies in the statutes Cummings invoked. Cummings’ lawyer, Andrew Rozynski, and Colleen Sinzdak, arguing for the U.S.

article thumbnail

Prefiling Offer by Business Partner Dooms Patent

Patently O

On appeal, however, the Federal Circuit has reversed–holding that the Eddings letter constituted a “commercial offer for sale of the claimed design” and therefore created a bar to patentability under the statute. Remember the contract foundational trio: Offer, Acceptance, Consideration.

article thumbnail

Epic’s Fight to #freefortnite: Challenging Exclusive Foreign Choice of Court Agreements under Australian Law

Conflict of Laws

5] They discerned this policy from various statutory provisions in Australia’s competition law as well as other public policy considerations. [6] 12] This includes the situation ‘where the party commencing proceedings in the face of an exclusive jurisdiction clause seeks to take advantage of what is or may be a mandatory law of the forum’. [13]

Laws 98