Remove Constitutional Law Remove Immigration Remove Laws Remove Legal
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encouraging Illegal Immigration

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court upheld a federal law that criminalizes “encouraging or inducing” an immigrant to come or remain in the United States unlawfully. According to the Court, the law does not run afoul of the First Amendment. In United States v. Hansen , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S.

article thumbnail

UN expresses concern over moves by UK government to facilitate Rwanda removal plan for migrants

JURIST

.” He warned of the negative human rights implications, stating: The combined effects of this bill, attempting to shield Government action from standard legal scrutiny, directly undercut basic human rights principles. Governments cannot revoke their international human rights and asylum-related obligations by legislation.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Kicks Off February Sitting With Oral Arguments in Three Cases

Constitutional Law Reporter

The issues before the Court involved Native American law and immigration. United States : The case involves the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause and how it applies toa prosecution in the Court of Indian Offenses. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. The justices heard oral arguments in three cases.

article thumbnail

Oh Canada: Government Blocks Citizenship Due to Russian Conviction for Criticizing the Ukrainian War

JonathanTurley

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada yanked the citizenship application after learning of the conviction under Putin’s draconian laws. Not only did she write the blogs while living in Canada, she notified Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada about the charges and supplied the underlying papers to the government.

article thumbnail

Lengthier opinions and shrinking cohesion: Indications for the future of the Supreme Court

SCOTUSBlog

Alito’s core legal analysis remained largely the same, with lengthy passages from the draft reappearing verbatim in the final opinion. Some language from the draft was omitted in the final opinion — mostly concerning legal citations. Alito also added some new language, the bulk of which responded to the dissent and concurrences.

Drafting 104
article thumbnail

Foreign Child Marriages and Constitutional Law – German Constitutional Court Holds Parts of the German Act to Combat Child Marriages Unconstitutional

Conflict of Laws

Yesterday, on March 29, 2023, the German Constitutional Court published its long-awaited (and also long) decision on the German “Act to Combat Child Marriage” ( Gesetz zur Bekämpfung von Kinderehen ). 1 EGBGB ) – regardless of whether the marriage is valid under the normally applicable foreign law. That was a long time ago.

article thumbnail

“Better Off Just Keeping His Mouth Shut”: University of Central Florida Hit With Major Free Speech Ruling

JonathanTurley

He also ruled the group did not have legal standing to challenge the bias-related incidents policy. Speech First filed the lawsuit last year and the case was heard by Senior U.S. District Judge Gregory Presnell who rejected Speech First’s arguments on the discriminatory-harassment policy. ’ Oral Arg. at 28:43–33:55.