Remove Constitutional Law Remove Criminal Law Remove Government Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Was Rittenhouse’s Possession of the AR-15 Unlawful?

JonathanTurley

At trial, however, prosecutor Thomas Binger at points seemed to be learning the governing law from Rittenhouse. However, the most damaging moment came outside of the presence of the jury when the judge drilled down on the law. It is also hard to instruct a jury on an ambiguous statute. I have a legal education.”

Statute 57
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Narrows Reach of Identity Fraud Statute

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court narrowed the scope of a federal aggravated identity theft statute. The justices unanimously held that a defendant “uses” another person’s means of identification “in relation to” a predicate offense when the use is at the crux of what makes the conduct criminal. In Durbin v. United States , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S.

Statute 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Supreme Court narrowly interprets ban on “encouraging or inducing” immigrants to remain unlawfully in the United States

SCOTUSBlog

An expansive reading of the statute, the court recognized, would arguably criminalize political advocacy or general encouragement. That means that someone can only run afoul of the statute if they intend for an immigrant to come or remain in the U.S. while knowing that is unlawful.

article thumbnail

Fourth Circuit Overturns Conviction Of Retired Air Force Colonel For Using Racial Slur

JonathanTurley

” The language of the statute in my view is unconstitutional due to its sweeping criminalization of any “curse or abuse” that could “provoke a breach of the peace.” ” However, the appellate panel corrected noted that such laws are narrowly construed in light of controlling precedent. .”

Statute 39
article thumbnail

Australia High Court Delivers Major Blow to Free Speech In Defamation Ruling

JonathanTurley

The statute defines “information content provider” as “any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service.” 47 U.S.C. § 230(b)(5).

Tort 33
article thumbnail

Connecticut High School Student Arrested For Posting Racist Slur

JonathanTurley

One of the greatest threats to free speech is the chilling effect caused by ambiguous or vague standards like the one contained in this statute. The “guise of constitutional freedom” is in fact the First Amendment’s protection of unpopular speech. Most concerning is the call for European style speech limits in this country.

article thumbnail

UNC Law Student Who Questioned Racial Incident Is Disqualified From Running For New Office

JonathanTurley

Sharma was then informed that he was subject to charges for violating the student government bylaws. First is SBA By-Law 11.2 ” The second is SBA By-Law 11.3 ” The student government then states in a conclusory manner that Sharma was found guilty on both charges and disqualified. DeBartolo Corp.

Laws 33