JURIST

OCTOBER 31, 2023

In a 92-page court ruling, Judge K. Providers requested a temporary injunction, arguing that the abortion restrictions violated state constitutional law and free speech. Defendants in this case say that the restriction constitutes a safeguard to inform women of the risks of abortion.

Laws 196

Laws Constitutional Law Court Rules Attorney 196

JURIST

FEBRUARY 19, 2024

Independent, effective judicial oversight is the bedrock of the rule of law – it must be respected and strengthened. The UK’s Select Committee on the Constitution echoed the concern voiced by Türk. .” This comes after the UK Supreme Court ruled in November 2023 that the Rwanda policy was unlawful.

Government 197

Government Immigration Constitutional Law Court Rules 197

Constitutional Law Reporter

JUNE 22, 2021

Supreme Court unanimously held that a tribal police officer has the authority to detain temporarily and to search non-Indian persons traveling on public rights-of-way running through a reservation for potential violations of state or federal law. The District Court granted Cooley’s motion to suppress the drug evidence.

Court Rules 98

Court Rules Court Constitutional Law Laws 98

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

Supreme Court held that Germany was entitled to State immunity in a lawsuit seeking compensation for the forced sale of medieval art known as the “Welfenschatz” during the rise of Nazi Germany. After unsuccessfully seeking compensation in Germany, the heirs brought several common law property claims in U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision.

Court Rules 89

Court Rules Court Government Laws 89

Constitutional Law Reporter

JUNE 16, 2021

Supreme Court held that a district court does not have the discretion to deny or reduce the costs awarded by an appellate court under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39. On appeal, the Court of Appeals determined that the OTCs had not underpaid on their taxes. Supreme Court’s Decision. In San Antonio v.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Court Constitutional Law Laws 52

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

It is the latest loss of the city, which continues to pass legislation that runs afoul of governing Supreme Court precedent. Heller , the Supreme Court in 2008 ruled the right to bear arms is an individual right. City of Chicago , the court ruled that this right applied against the states. Then, in Wrenn v.

Court Rules 42

Court Rules Court Government Laws 42

Constitutional Law Reporter

APRIL 10, 2024

Supreme Court ruled that public officials may be held liable for their social media activity in certain circumstances. The District Court found that because Freed managed his Facebook page in his private capacity, and because only state action can give rise to liability under §1983, Lindke’s claim failed. In Lindke v.

Court 52

Court Cause of Action Government Court Rules 52

JURIST

APRIL 2, 2022

The South Korean Constitutional Court Thursday upheld the nation’s near-ban on tattooing. In a 5-4 decision, the court dismissed the suit and upheld the current policy that only medical professionals can give tattoos. More recently, debate has emerged over whether tattoos are protected under federal copyright law.

Court 104

Court Court Rules Legal Legal 104

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 22, 2021

Supreme Court held that a refusal by the U.S. The decision represents the first 5-to-4 split in a case argued during the Court’s 2020-21 term. Salinas sought review with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The post Divided Court Rules U.S. In Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board , 592 U. 351 et seq.]

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Court Legal Legal 52

The Crime Report

JULY 6, 2022

Applying the regulatory approach used in the “free-world” has significant advantages over constitutional law in mitigating abusive conditions in prisons and jails, according to a paper published in the Yale Law Journal. Constitutional law does not fill the gap,” Littman writes. “[It

Constitutional Law 105

Constitutional Law Litigation Litigating Laws 105

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 17, 2024

Today, the Supreme Court will hear two of the most important cases of the term. At issue is the continued meaning (or even viability) of the Chevron doctrine, the 40-year-old doctrine granting deference to federal agencies in regulations carrying out federal laws. In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled in Chevron U.S.A.

Court 54

Court Court Rules Calendaring Government 54

JonathanTurley

JUNE 12, 2022

The General Counsel found that the company was violating federal law by preventing staff from wearing BLM imagery on their aprons. That includes the Supreme Court’s unambiguous statement that “[w]hen an employee engages in speech that is part of the employee’s job duties, the employee’s words are really the words of the employer.”

Court Rules 37

Court Rules Court Administrative Law Government 37

JonathanTurley

JULY 1, 2021

In the final decision of the Supreme Court before its summer break, Chief Justice John Roberts delivered a major ruling striking down the California law requiring the disclosure of donors for charities. The Court has previously upheld disclosure requirements as in 2010 when it ruled in Doe v.

Laws 49

Laws Court Education Court Rules 49

JonathanTurley

MARCH 9, 2021

If Georgia Gwinnett College wanted to foster greater unity in its use of “free speech zones,” it succeeded in prompting a near unanimous Supreme Court in ruling against it in favor of free speech this week. The Supreme Court has now said enough. Associate Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in Uzuegbunam v.

Court Rules 53

Court Rules Court Litigation Litigating 53

JonathanTurley

MARCH 24, 2022

The court included the picture in its opinion: When Schmidt sent around a demand for the person responsible to step forward, Hiers publicly accepted responsibility. Accepting the allegations as true, the Court concludes that Hiers plausibly alleged that the university officials violated his right to freedom of speech.”

Court Rules 40

Court Rules Court Contract Education 40

Constitutional Law Reporter

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

Supreme Court had a busy week, hearing oral arguments in five cases. The primary issue in both cases is whether the Court should reverse its decision in Grutter v. The primary issue in both cases is whether the Court should reverse its decision in Grutter v. Below is a brief summary of the other cases before the Court: Cruz v.

Constitutional Law 52

Constitutional Law Statute Education Court Rules 52

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 29, 2022

Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, a capital defendant’s request for habeas relief on the ground that his lawyer conceded guilt over his objection, as in 2018’s McCoy v. After McCoy , Tyler unsuccessfully sought relief in Louisiana state courts. In Tyler v.

Lawyer 76

Lawyer Lawyers Court Court Rules 76

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 24, 2021

Many observers are waiting for the United States Supreme Court to decide whether to delve again into college admissions with a pending case out of Harvard University in which Asian and white students claim discrimination. ” The case will now go to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Judge Loretta C.

Court Rules 34

Court Rules Court Education Constitutional Law 34

JURIST

NOVEMBER 3, 2023

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled 6-1 on Friday that the mandatory minimum sentence for child luring is unconstitutional as it violates the right against cruel and unusual punishment under Section 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom. On appeal, the Crown asked the Supreme Court to find it constitutional.

Court Rules 260

Court Rules Court Constitutional Law Criminal Law 260

Constitutional Law Reporter

SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

Supreme Court held that the False Claims Act’s scienter element — which asks whether a defendant “knowingly” submitted a “false” claim to the government — refers to a defendant’s knowledge and subjective beliefs — not to what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed. SuperValu Inc. , S. _ (2023), the U.S.

Court 52

Court Constitutional Law Court Rules Court Decisions 52

JonathanTurley

JUNE 23, 2022

As predicted , the Supreme Court handed down a momentous opinion in favor of Second Amendment rights today in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. In 2008, the Supreme Court recognized the right to bear arms as an individual right in District of Columbia v. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f) Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f)

Court 53

Court Court Rules Litigation Litigating 53

JURIST

NOVEMBER 3, 2022

The crossed-out language is what will be removed from the constitution if Proposal 2 is adopted. According to the author of Proposal 2, Vermont constitutional law professor Peter Teachout, the amendment makes no change to substantive rights. Evidence lies in both the constitutional language and judicial precedent.

Constitutional Law 197

Constitutional Law Drafting Contract Court Rules 197

JonathanTurley

MARCH 7, 2021

Meghan just won a case against Associated Newspapers and the ruling by London High Court Judge Mark Warby should be a concern for anyone who values the freedom of the press. And when such are the mores of the community, it would be unwise for a court to bar their expression in the newspapers, books, and magazines of the day.”

Court Rules 33

Court Rules Drafting Court Tort 33

Constitutional Law Reporter

SEPTEMBER 15, 2021

By a vote of 5-4, the justices held that only a plaintiff concretely harmed by a defendant’s violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) has Article III standing to seek damages against that private defendant in federal court. The District Court ruled that all class members had Article III standing on each of the three statutory claims.

Court 52

Court Cause of Action Tort Punitive Damages 52

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 27, 2023

Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday threw out the conviction of Billy Raymond Counterman, a Colorado man who was sentenced to four-and-a-half years in prison for stalking based on his Facebook messages. Counterman came to the Supreme Court last summer, asking the justices to weigh in.

Court 130

Court Constitutional Law Court Rules Laws 130

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 4, 2021

We have been discussing ( here and here and here ) the Supreme Court challenge in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. Bruen , the first Second Amendment case before the Supreme Court in over ten years. In 2008, the Supreme Court recognized the right to bear arms as an individual right in District of Columbia v.

Court 40

Court Laws Court Rules Constitutional Law 40

JonathanTurley

MAY 26, 2022

There is a controversial decision out of a French administrative court this week to suspend a policy allowing for Muslim women to wear “burkinis” in municipal pools in the city of Grenoble. The court ruled that such policies “undermin[ed] secularism.”

Court 37

Court Court Rules Government Laws 37

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 31, 2022

Here is the column: Forty-four years ago, the Supreme Court was the center of a raging protest by thousands as the justices took up the case of Regents of the University of California v. As a teenage congressional page, I was one of the faces in that crowd gathered around the court in October 1977 to watch history being made.

Court 40

Court Construction Education Court Rules 40

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 9, 2022

Lucero of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. I will be joined by two distinguished academics: Professor Elizabeth Sepper, University of Texas at Austin School of Law and Professor John Yoo, University of California Berkeley School of Law. The Supreme Court’s new religious clause jurisprudence has transformed the area.

Court Rules 32

Court Rules Court Laws Constitutional Law 32

JonathanTurley

JUNE 24, 2021

While not one of the matinee cases often discussed in the press, the Supreme Court handed down a major ruling this week on takings under the Fifth Amendment. In a 6-3 decision that broke along ideological lines (a departure from a long line of unanimous or non-ideological rulings ), the court ruled in Cedar Point Nursery v.

Court 35

Court Government Court Rules Laws 35

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 28, 2022

Last year, the court restricted the ability of state prisoners to develop new evidence to support claims that their attorneys failed to investigate leads that could have shown they were factually innocent. In the Supreme Court’s habeas corpus jurisprudence, the answer is never simple. In 2019, the court ruled in Rehaif v.

Felony 94

Felony Statute Government Court 94

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 9, 2021

Free speech has always held a precarious position in Australia which does not have an equivalent to the First Amendment in guaranteeing free speech as a constitutional right. Despite this history, a new decision out of the High Court is still shocking in its implications for further attacks on free speech.

Tort 34

Tort Court Compensatory Damages Punitive Damages 34

JonathanTurley

MARCH 6, 2023

City of Fort Smith , the court heard a similar case. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that the verbal abuse was still protected speech. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that the verbal abuse was still protected speech. For example, in Thurairajah v.

Court Rules 32

Court Rules Court Drafting Laws 32

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

APRIL 8, 2022

On February 8, 2022, the Chamber of Deputies of the Italian Republic gave its final approval to the proposed constitutional law A.C.3156-B 3156-B providing environmental protection amendments to Articles 9 and 41 of the Italian Constitution. By Riccardo Luporini, Matteo Fermeglia, and Maria Antonia Tigre. 179/2019 ).

Litigation 96

Litigation Litigating Government Legal 96

JonathanTurley

MARCH 22, 2021

University of San Diego Law Professor Thomas Smith has been put under investigation for the use of an offensive term in a column criticizing the Chinese government and its role in the pandemic. A core value of the University of San Diego School of Law is that all members of the community must be treated with dignity and respect.

Government 39

Government Laws Law School Contract 39

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 5, 2021

The United States Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (and the later denial of a motion for consideration ) in rejecting the much touted lawsuit to give residents a vote in Congress. I have written about D.C. ” Obviously, this decision would not impact D.C.

Court 41

Court Court Reporting Education Court Reporter 41

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 2, 2021

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will take up arguably the oldest and most controversial right in our history. Bruen is the first major gun rights case in over ten years to come before the Supreme Court and it has the makings of a major gun rights victory in the making. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f) New York State Rifle Association v.

Court 45

Court Laws Court Rules Constitutional Law 45