SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 28, 2022

Last year, the court restricted the ability of state prisoners to develop new evidence to support claims that their attorneys failed to investigate leads that could have shown they were factually innocent. In the Supreme Court’s habeas corpus jurisprudence, the answer is never simple. In 2019, the court ruled in Rehaif v.

Felony 94

Felony Statute Government Court 94

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 14, 2021

The statement could effectively knock out the misdemeanor gun possession count — the one count that could still be in play for the jury after the prosecution’s case on the more serious offense appeared to collapse in court. It is called the “rule of lenity” and has been around in the English system for centuries.

Statute 58

Statute Misdemeanor Criminal Law Felony 58

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 25, 2020

The Attorney General of the United States may be one of the most perfectly tailored case for major Supreme Court decision. In ruling that a non-violent tax conviction can result in the denial of gun ownership, the panel presents a clean case to further define the contours of the individual rights recognized in District of Columbia v.

Felony 56

Felony Government Court Laws 56

JonathanTurley

JUNE 17, 2022

It was due to the paucity of direct evidence of a crime that would hold up in court. LEXIS 1033 *, 2021 WL 633384, the court noted: Attempted murder requires a finding of specific intent to kill such that implied malice is insufficient to support a conviction for that offense. See People v. Gillespie, 2022 Cal. Indeed, in People v.

Mens Rea 42

Mens Rea Law School Laws Felony 42

JonathanTurley

JUNE 29, 2022

In an unanimous 6-0 ruling, the Michigan Supreme Court held that her office committed a fatal and inexplicable error in prosecuting nine officials for the Flint water crisis, including former Gov. It can go up to 10 yeas for felonies like manslaughter, which were the charges brought against two defendants. Rick Snyder.

Attorney 50

Attorney Statute Felony Court Rules 50

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Experts like Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe have previously declared Trump’s felonies were shown “without any doubt, beyond a reasonable doubt, beyond any doubt, and the crimes are obvious.” That speech appears protected by the First Amendment and existing Supreme Court precedent. At 4:17 p.m., In Brandenburg v.

Mens Rea 59

Mens Rea Felony Drafting Court Rules 59