Diane Drain
JANUARY 30, 2021
2007) (a cause of action “accrues” each time a party fails to perform as required by the contract) and Ortiz v. 2015) (each time the debtor fails to make a payment when it becomes due, a separate breach occurs and a cause of action “accrues”, starting the clock). 569, 572 (9th Cir. Trinity Fin. LLC , 98 F.Supp.
SCOTUSBlog
AUGUST 19, 2022
The court heard one set of these suits in 2020, against the Treasury Department and the agency created as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s conservator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency. They filed a series of lawsuits against the government. Coinbase, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 15, 2023
The case involves a strange entity, the Financial Oversight and Management Board, created under a 2016 federal statute, known as PROMESA, to take control of and restructure the deeply mal-administered finances of Puerto Rico. One involves “a statute [that] says in so many words that it is stripping immunity from a sovereign entity.”
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 2, 2022
Issue : Whether a court may deny a plaintiff with an antitrust injury proximately caused by a defendant’s antitrust violation a Clayton Act cause of action based on a multifactor, prudential balancing test of “antitrust standing.”. New York State Department of Tax and Finance. O’Donnell & Sons, Inc.
Day on Torts
AUGUST 9, 2021
The second element required plaintiff to show that she “could not have discovered the cause of action despite exercising reasonable care and diligence.” internal citation omitted).
The Fashion Law
MAY 18, 2021
As a result of “deteriorating financing metrics,” TAL – which became a minority owner of the company following its 2016 investment – alleges that the Del Vecchios “began soliciting offers for Brooks Brothers from potential third-party buyers” without any involvement from the plaintiffs.”
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 9, 2021
Arguing that the 9th Circuit deepened “a square, widely acknowledged conflict,” CVS asks for the Supreme Court’s review. These and other petitions of the week are below: SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. M&T Bank. 4617(b)(12).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
104 
Let's personalize your content