At the Lectern

JULY 28, 2022

At the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, after which Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye announced her retirement, actions of note included: Government immunity. The court granted review in County of Santa Clara v. The court granted-and-held in In re Z.T. The court granted review in Cynosure, LLC v.

Government 49

Government Court Contract Cause of Action 49

At the Lectern

JULY 14, 2022

At the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, a double one, actions of note included: Lemon Law. The court granted review in Rodriguez v. The appellate court concluded the definition is “a catchall for sales of essentially new vehicles where the applicable warranty was issued with the sale.” FCA US, LLC.

Court 49

Court Laws Cause of Action Manufacturing 49

The Fashion Law

OCTOBER 25, 2021

In a declaratory judgment action filed in October 2020 , WWW and Bernstein asked a New York federal court to formally declare that they did not run afoul of the indie intimates brand’s rights by using a lookalike “Silhouettes Design.” Fast forward to May 2021, and following a combination of the two cases before the U.S.

Court 79

Court Cause of Action Manufacturing Drafting 79

The Fashion Law

JANUARY 7, 2022

Ultimately, Maglula argued that Amazon made it “impossible” to bring the third-party sellers “to court and investigate sources of the knock-offs.”. Following failed attempts by Amazon to compel arbitration and then to have the case transferred to a federal court in its native Seattle, Judge Liam O’Grady of the U.S.

Manufacturing 76

Manufacturing Cause of Action Court Laws 76

The Fashion Law

JULY 30, 2021

Setting the stage in its July 26 filing, WGACA asserts that at “the heart of the instant action is Chanel’s attempt, through the courts, to control the secondary/resale market by attacking a reseller of its goods with multiple and unfounded claims which Chanel continues to press despite the absence of a factual basis.” in 2012.”

Manufacturing 104

Manufacturing Cause of Action Court Laws 104

The Fashion Law

JULY 21, 2021

In the complaint that it filed in a federal court in California on Monday, Nike claims that Customs By Ilene, Inc., One of those third-parties that is looking to piggyback on the appeal of Nike and the burgeoning customization market? Drip Creationz. ” Corona, California-based Drip Creationz does not stop there, though, per Nike. .”

Cause of Action 145

Cause of Action Manufacturing Legal Legal 145

The Fashion Law

DECEMBER 20, 2021

A behind the scenes scuffle between Lululemon and Peloton recently landed in federal court, with the exercise bike -maker arguing that Lululemon threatened it with litigation over its “similarly striking” garments. According to the declaratory judgment action that it filed with the U.S. Drip Creationz. and adidas America, Inc.

Laws 97

Laws Cause of Action Litigation Litigating 97

Patently O

MARCH 18, 2024

by Dennis Crouch In a recent nonprecedential decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court ruling ordering the correction of inventorship for U.S. Tube-Mac, is the plaintiff in this case and is looking to manufacture its own version of the container systems. Tube-Mac Indus., Campbell , No. 2022-2170 (Fed. Iolab Corp. ,

Statute 58

Statute Cause of Action Court Rules Court 58

The Fashion Law

JULY 19, 2021

District Court for the Central District of California states that the parties “agreed to a settlement in principle and will finalize the outstanding matters before the pretrial conference scheduled for July 16, 2021, with the district judge.” In response to Fashion Nova’s request that the court compel Ms. Versace to testify.

Depose 144

Depose Depositions Manufacturing Cause of Action 144

The Fashion Law

MAY 7, 2021

In terms of what such hypothetical legal issues look like, they run the gamut – from potential trademark infringement and dilution causes of action to questions about the role of the right of publicity. along with Manufacture de Haute Horlogerie SA, which owns the manufacturing facilities for the Genta brand.

Cause of Action 61

Cause of Action Manufacturing Freelance Legal 61

The Fashion Law

JULY 19, 2021

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a lower court’s summary judgment decision – in which it held that Costco was liable to Tiffany & Co. for willful trademark infringement and counterfeiting – and remanded the case back to the district court for a new trial. The lower court sided with Tiffany & Co.

Manufacturing 61

Manufacturing Court Cause of Action Education 61

The Fashion Law

APRIL 26, 2021

District Court for the Northern District of California, Facebook, Inc. In other words, “Consumers are likely to be misled into believing that [her] products are manufactured by, licensed by, sponsored by, approved by, or otherwise associated with Gucci.” According to the joint lawsuit that they filed on Monday in the U.S.

Manufacturing 105

Manufacturing Cause of Action Contract Litigation 105

JonathanTurley

JULY 23, 2021

NO PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION. (a) As will come as little surprise to many on this blog, I oppose such government requirements imposed on individual contractors and employees as inimical to free speech , a view shared by various federal courts. I have the same concerns over the arrest of protesters in other countries like France.

Cause of Action 50

Cause of Action Government Manufacturing Laws 50

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2022

A tort action for intentional infliction of emotional distress is likely to fail. There must be not just outrageous conduct but conduct intended to cause severe emotional distress. Courts regularly exclude injuries associated with the exercise of free speech or artistic expression. Again, the court agreed.

Tort 37

Tort Litigation Litigating Manufacturing 37

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 27, 2021

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. All the action on the relist front after the Oct. The Supreme Court granted review in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. And finally, the court granted the petition in Abdulla v. Rivas-Villegas , 20-1690 ).

Court 78

Court Government Cause of Action Manufacturing 78

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 31, 2021

A tort action for intentional infliction of emotional distress is likely to fail. There must be not just outrageous conduct but conduct intended to cause severe emotional distress. Courts regularly exclude injuries associated with the exercise of free speech or artistic expression. Again, the court agreed.

Tort 38

Tort Litigation Litigating Manufacturing 38

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 3, 2021

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. Then, on Monday morning, the court disposed of two long-running free-exercise-of-religion cases. The court granted the petition in Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v. The court also denied review in Coonce v.

Cause of Action 73

Cause of Action Court Government Immigration 73

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2023

On June 15, 2023, the court issued the ultimate judgment not only on the torts claims but perhaps the state of our politics. Louis, a Missouri court was faced with a claim from Carly Munoz who in 2019 sent to Six Flags’ Fright Fest with her cousin. A tort action for intentional infliction of emotional distress is likely to fail.

Tort 48

Tort Litigation Litigating Manufacturing 48

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

Circuit Court of Appeals found that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) failed to adequately analyze the climate change and environmental justice impacts of two liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals on the Brownsville Shipping Channel in Texas and two pipelines that would carry LNG to one of the terminals. 20-1045 (D.C.

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Court Laws 40

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 27, 2020

We have yet to see a filing over the emotional distress caused by this year’s microwave Turkey prank where college kids are texting their parents to ask how long to cook their turkeys in the microwave. Some things are happily left out of the courts. One such case now in court was brought by Amanda DuVall, 28.

Tort 33

Tort Statute Court Criminal Law 33

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 8, 2023

Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the Biden administration to temporarily reinstate a rule by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives regulating “ghost guns” while a challenge to the rule continues in a federal appeals court. On June 30, O’Connor vacated the rule nationwide.

Court 98

Court Manufacturing Cause of Action Government 98